Add to ORKGThe Court determined that: (1) Wells Fargo failed to present evidence of unfairness or irregularity that would invalidate the foreclosure sale; (2) pursuant to NRS 112.170(2), a regularly conducted, noncollusive foreclosure sale under NRS Chapter 116 is exempt under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA); and (3) inaccuracies in a foreclosure deed are not sufficient to invalidate a foreclosure sale that complied with NRS Chapter 116
Madrid v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp., 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 105 S. Ct. 125 (198...
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether a quiet title action from a foreclosure sale was barr...
The Court determined that: (1) Wells Fargo failed to present evidence of unfairness or irregularity ...
The Court determined that (1) NRS § 106.210 and NRS § 111.325 do not require a beneficiary to be ide...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment. In its holdin...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
(Excerpt) In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AMH Roman Two NC, LLC, the Fourth Circuit denied Wells Fargo’...
The Court determined that becausethe holder of the first deed of trust provided valid tender of the ...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
(Excerpt) Should foreclosure sales that comply with state law be subject to avoidance under federal ...
In theory, the substantive rights of secured creditors such as mortgagees are affected much less by ...
When a court grants retroactive annulment for an automatic bankruptcy stay on a property, a sale of ...
Madrid v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp., 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 105 S. Ct. 125 (198...
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether a quiet title action from a foreclosure sale was barr...
The Court determined that: (1) Wells Fargo failed to present evidence of unfairness or irregularity ...
The Court determined that (1) NRS § 106.210 and NRS § 111.325 do not require a beneficiary to be ide...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment. In its holdin...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
(Excerpt) In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AMH Roman Two NC, LLC, the Fourth Circuit denied Wells Fargo’...
The Court determined that becausethe holder of the first deed of trust provided valid tender of the ...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
(Excerpt) Should foreclosure sales that comply with state law be subject to avoidance under federal ...
In theory, the substantive rights of secured creditors such as mortgagees are affected much less by ...
When a court grants retroactive annulment for an automatic bankruptcy stay on a property, a sale of ...
Madrid v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp., 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 105 S. Ct. 125 (198...
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Supreme Court of Nevada considered whether a quiet title action from a foreclosure sale was barr...