Add to ORKGThe Court determined that: (1) Wells Fargo failed to present evidence of unfairness or irregularity that would invalidate the foreclosure sale; (2) pursuant to NRS 112.170(2), a regularly conducted, noncollusive foreclosure sale under NRS Chapter 116 is exempt under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA); and (3) inaccuracies in a foreclosure deed are not sufficient to invalidate a foreclosure sale that complied with NRS Chapter 116
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
The Court determined that: (1) Wells Fargo failed to present evidence of unfairness or irregularity ...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
The Court determined that (1) NRS § 106.210 and NRS § 111.325 do not require a beneficiary to be ide...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court determined that becausethe holder of the first deed of trust provided valid tender of the ...
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Court determined that, under provisions of NRS 116.31162, when an HOA records a notice of a fore...
The Court held that NRS 11.190(1)(b)’s statute of limitations does not apply to nonjudicial foreclos...
When a court grants retroactive annulment for an automatic bankruptcy stay on a property, a sale of ...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
The Court determined that: (1) Wells Fargo failed to present evidence of unfairness or irregularity ...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
The Court determined that (1) NRS § 106.210 and NRS § 111.325 do not require a beneficiary to be ide...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court determined that becausethe holder of the first deed of trust provided valid tender of the ...
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Court determined that, under provisions of NRS 116.31162, when an HOA records a notice of a fore...
The Court held that NRS 11.190(1)(b)’s statute of limitations does not apply to nonjudicial foreclos...
When a court grants retroactive annulment for an automatic bankruptcy stay on a property, a sale of ...
The Court concluded that the promissory note, which had security interest by both a deed of trust of...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court determined that Nevada law does not recognize implied restrictive covenants based on a com...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...