Add to ORKGThe Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners association (HOA) fails to serve the Notice of Default (NOD) to the recorded beneficiary of the deed of trust and (2) that recorded beneficiary’s successor in interest is unable to demonstrate how it was prejudiced or injured by the defective notice to their predecessor in interest. Further, a HOA does not lose standing to foreclose on a property when it enters into a factoring agreement that does not change the relationship between debtor and lender
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment. In its holdin...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
The Court determined that becausethe holder of the first deed of trust provided valid tender of the ...
This article discusses a California case which held that a slightly premature service of notices...
The Court determined that, under provisions of NRS 116.31162, when an HOA records a notice of a fore...
This Court has previously held that the Federal Foreclosure Bar preempts NRS 116. 3116 and that a fi...
If a homeowner that owns property in Nevada but declares bankruptcy in Texas and fails to list the H...
The Court determined that: (1) Wells Fargo failed to present evidence of unfairness or irregularity ...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court determined that (1) NRS § 106.210 and NRS § 111.325 do not require a beneficiary to be ide...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...
The Court found that a foreclosure sale is not invalid due to lack of notice where: (1) a homeowners...
The Court considered an appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment. In its holdin...
No issue of material fact exists in this case because the undisputed evidence confirms that the firs...
The Court determined that becausethe holder of the first deed of trust provided valid tender of the ...
This article discusses a California case which held that a slightly premature service of notices...
The Court determined that, under provisions of NRS 116.31162, when an HOA records a notice of a fore...
This Court has previously held that the Federal Foreclosure Bar preempts NRS 116. 3116 and that a fi...
If a homeowner that owns property in Nevada but declares bankruptcy in Texas and fails to list the H...
The Court determined that: (1) Wells Fargo failed to present evidence of unfairness or irregularity ...
The Court determined that (1) previous case law and the NRS require an HOA that is seeking to forecl...
The Court determined that (1) NRS § 106.210 and NRS § 111.325 do not require a beneficiary to be ide...
The Court considers whether the time limitations of NRS 107.080(5)-(6) bars an action challenging an...
The Court determined that homeowners may cure defaults as to superpriority portions of HOA liens muc...
The Court determined that each party in a quiet title action has the burden of demonstrating superio...
The Court affirmed the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss and determined that dee...