Eleven plaintiffs brought a common law action, seeking injunctive relief against the six largest American producers of greenhouse gases. Because the EPA had not yet promulgated regulations governing the production of greenhouse gases, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that federal law had not displaced plaintiffs \u27 common law claim. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that even though regulations had not been promulgated, EPA occupied the field nevertheless. The decision marks an extension of the regulatory displacement of federal common law to regulations that are merely anticipated Such extension, or anticipatory delegation, represents an unacceptably large incursion into the scope of federal common law. Anticipatory delegati...
As Congress has yet to enact a comprehensive legislative framework to address climate change, enviro...
The surprise in Massachusetts v. EPA was not that it was a close, hotly contested case. Rather, the ...
Prior to the erection in the 1970s of a comprehensive federal regulatory infrastructure to protect t...
Eleven plaintiffs brought a common law action, seeking injunctive relief against the six largest Ame...
This Note considers how the Supreme Court’s decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA (UARG) m...
In the latter half of 2009, the Second Circuit in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co. and the...
Many legal hurdles confront plaintiffs who assert common law public nuisance claims against energy c...
This Article challenges conventional accounts of whether those who drafted the 1970 Clean Air Act in...
In its first full Term with its newest member, the U.S. Supreme Court marched decidedly to the right...
The Trump Administration is rapidly turning the clock back on climate policy and environmental regul...
Since the 1970s, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act—and the regulations issued under their au...
On June 20, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in American Electric Po...
In American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut (AEP), the Supreme Court explicitly left ajar the door...
Federal law often fails to mitigate environmental harm. An alternative litigation response when fede...
The much-toasted Chevron Revolution began with a bubble. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 capp...
As Congress has yet to enact a comprehensive legislative framework to address climate change, enviro...
The surprise in Massachusetts v. EPA was not that it was a close, hotly contested case. Rather, the ...
Prior to the erection in the 1970s of a comprehensive federal regulatory infrastructure to protect t...
Eleven plaintiffs brought a common law action, seeking injunctive relief against the six largest Ame...
This Note considers how the Supreme Court’s decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA (UARG) m...
In the latter half of 2009, the Second Circuit in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co. and the...
Many legal hurdles confront plaintiffs who assert common law public nuisance claims against energy c...
This Article challenges conventional accounts of whether those who drafted the 1970 Clean Air Act in...
In its first full Term with its newest member, the U.S. Supreme Court marched decidedly to the right...
The Trump Administration is rapidly turning the clock back on climate policy and environmental regul...
Since the 1970s, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act—and the regulations issued under their au...
On June 20, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in American Electric Po...
In American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut (AEP), the Supreme Court explicitly left ajar the door...
Federal law often fails to mitigate environmental harm. An alternative litigation response when fede...
The much-toasted Chevron Revolution began with a bubble. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 capp...
As Congress has yet to enact a comprehensive legislative framework to address climate change, enviro...
The surprise in Massachusetts v. EPA was not that it was a close, hotly contested case. Rather, the ...
Prior to the erection in the 1970s of a comprehensive federal regulatory infrastructure to protect t...