Add to ORKGOn June 20, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in American Electric Power v. Connecticut. This is the second climate change case to be decided by that court and the first to concern common law claims, where the plaintiffs claimed that the greenhouse gases (GHGs) from power plants constitute a common law nuisance, and asked the court to issue an injunction requiring the plants to reduce their emissions
As the impacts of a warming climate system become more apparent and countries across the globe begin...
On November 29, 2006, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Massachusetts v. Environmental Prote...
In its first full Term with its newest member, the U.S. Supreme Court marched decidedly to the right...
There are five common law/nuisance suits addressing climate change now or formerly active. Of the th...
On June 20, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in American Electric P...
In American Electric Power v. Connecticut the Supreme Court confronted climate change litigation for...
In the latter half of 2009, the Second Circuit in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co. and the...
On April 19, 2011, two courts heard oral arguments in cases that will define the future of climate c...
In American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut (AEP), the Supreme Court explicitly left ajar the door...
A discussion of climate change nuisance litigation pending a Supreme Court ruling on the matter in t...
On March 21 of this year, something unusual took place at a U.S. courthouse in San Francisco: a grou...
This Note considers how the Supreme Court’s decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA (UARG) m...
As debate over global warming continues to intensify, the United States Supreme Court has taken step...
Approximately 35 lawsuits have been filed in the United States concerning global climate change, tog...
This symposium analyzes the role of litigation in climate change regulation, with a particular focus...
As the impacts of a warming climate system become more apparent and countries across the globe begin...
On November 29, 2006, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Massachusetts v. Environmental Prote...
In its first full Term with its newest member, the U.S. Supreme Court marched decidedly to the right...
There are five common law/nuisance suits addressing climate change now or formerly active. Of the th...
On June 20, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in American Electric P...
In American Electric Power v. Connecticut the Supreme Court confronted climate change litigation for...
In the latter half of 2009, the Second Circuit in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co. and the...
On April 19, 2011, two courts heard oral arguments in cases that will define the future of climate c...
In American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut (AEP), the Supreme Court explicitly left ajar the door...
A discussion of climate change nuisance litigation pending a Supreme Court ruling on the matter in t...
On March 21 of this year, something unusual took place at a U.S. courthouse in San Francisco: a grou...
This Note considers how the Supreme Court’s decision in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA (UARG) m...
As debate over global warming continues to intensify, the United States Supreme Court has taken step...
Approximately 35 lawsuits have been filed in the United States concerning global climate change, tog...
This symposium analyzes the role of litigation in climate change regulation, with a particular focus...
As the impacts of a warming climate system become more apparent and countries across the globe begin...
On November 29, 2006, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Massachusetts v. Environmental Prote...
In its first full Term with its newest member, the U.S. Supreme Court marched decidedly to the right...