Prior to the erection in the 1970s of a comprehensive federal regulatory infrastructure to protect the environment, transboundary pollution disputes frequently were adjudicated by the U.S. Supreme Court, exercising its original jurisdiction over disputes between states. In a series of cases commencing at the dawn of the Twentieth Century, the Court served as a national arbiter of interstate pollution disputes. This paper reviews the history of the Supreme Court\u27s use of these cases to develop a federal common law of interstate nuisance. The paper argues that while federal common law initially performed a zoning function by encouraging polluters to relocate to less populated areas, injunctions issued by the Court ultimately spawned the de...
This article reviews the troubled history of the “Waters of the United States” Rule of the Clean Wat...
In the last seven years, the Supreme Court has decided several cases that potentially alter the bal...
This article examines whether the Supreme Court’s decisions in Alden v. Maine, College Savings Bank ...
This paper argues that the common law of interstate nuisance remains an essential tool despite the r...
City of Milwaukee v. Illinois, 101 S.Ct. 1784 (1981). In the landmark decision Erie Railroad v. Tomk...
Over four centuries, nuisance law has proved its versatility. Originally, a near strict liability do...
PIn Solid Waste Association of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( SWANCC ), the ...
Since 1970, pollution control in the United States has centered on national level regulatory approac...
In 1972 the Supreme Court in Illinois v. City of Milwaukee established the federal common law of pub...
The United States Supreme Court recently announced yet another basis for federal jurisdiction over a...
In the summer of 1980, Chicago\u27s beaches were fouled by raw and inadequately treated sewage, alle...
Since the 1970s, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act—and the regulations issued under their au...
This paper identifies and evaluates, from an economic point of view, the role of the judiciary the s...
In City of Milwaukee v. Illinois and Michigan, the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment ...
Until quite recently it has been the accepted view that one of man\u27s chief functions was to contr...
This article reviews the troubled history of the “Waters of the United States” Rule of the Clean Wat...
In the last seven years, the Supreme Court has decided several cases that potentially alter the bal...
This article examines whether the Supreme Court’s decisions in Alden v. Maine, College Savings Bank ...
This paper argues that the common law of interstate nuisance remains an essential tool despite the r...
City of Milwaukee v. Illinois, 101 S.Ct. 1784 (1981). In the landmark decision Erie Railroad v. Tomk...
Over four centuries, nuisance law has proved its versatility. Originally, a near strict liability do...
PIn Solid Waste Association of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( SWANCC ), the ...
Since 1970, pollution control in the United States has centered on national level regulatory approac...
In 1972 the Supreme Court in Illinois v. City of Milwaukee established the federal common law of pub...
The United States Supreme Court recently announced yet another basis for federal jurisdiction over a...
In the summer of 1980, Chicago\u27s beaches were fouled by raw and inadequately treated sewage, alle...
Since the 1970s, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act—and the regulations issued under their au...
This paper identifies and evaluates, from an economic point of view, the role of the judiciary the s...
In City of Milwaukee v. Illinois and Michigan, the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment ...
Until quite recently it has been the accepted view that one of man\u27s chief functions was to contr...
This article reviews the troubled history of the “Waters of the United States” Rule of the Clean Wat...
In the last seven years, the Supreme Court has decided several cases that potentially alter the bal...
This article examines whether the Supreme Court’s decisions in Alden v. Maine, College Savings Bank ...