Add to ORKGIn a wrongful discharge action based on the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine courts created a sleeper claim favoring terminated at will employees.\u27 Generally, Missouri courts categorically constrain the public policy exception in a narrow and clear cut fashion. However, some Missouri courts pushed and rubbed at the bright lines of those categories and created a hazy area of unpredictability in the exception. In addition, federal courts interpreting the Missouri public policy exception introduced a significant pre-emption dispute which Missouri state courts have yet to address
The Article begins with a brief treatment of employment at will and its modern exceptions. The Artic...
In recent years, courts in other jurisdictions have created certain exceptions to the general rule t...
Most courts hold that in-house counsel have no cause of action under public policy or retaliatory di...
In a wrongful discharge action based on the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctri...
In Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., the Court of Appeals for the Eastern District of Missouri held...
In recent years, the traditional common law rule known as “employment at will,” has come under attac...
Wrongful discharge in violation of public policy circumscribes the employment at-will doctrine by pr...
Throughout the country, courts are scrambling to fill the void left by the rapid disappearance of th...
This Note examines the extent to which courts should apply the public policy exception to abrogate t...
The purposes of this article are to examine the current public policy case law, commentary, and rela...
This Note will trace the cases following Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co. and the confusion among t...
This Article analyzes the federal question jurisdiction issue in the context of state law claims for...
Recent developments concerning the application of the employment-at-will rule demonstrate that court...
In Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Company, the Washington Supreme Court limited the employer\u27s right...
This Note will trace the cases following Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co. and the confusion among t...
The Article begins with a brief treatment of employment at will and its modern exceptions. The Artic...
In recent years, courts in other jurisdictions have created certain exceptions to the general rule t...
Most courts hold that in-house counsel have no cause of action under public policy or retaliatory di...
In a wrongful discharge action based on the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctri...
In Dunn v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., the Court of Appeals for the Eastern District of Missouri held...
In recent years, the traditional common law rule known as “employment at will,” has come under attac...
Wrongful discharge in violation of public policy circumscribes the employment at-will doctrine by pr...
Throughout the country, courts are scrambling to fill the void left by the rapid disappearance of th...
This Note examines the extent to which courts should apply the public policy exception to abrogate t...
The purposes of this article are to examine the current public policy case law, commentary, and rela...
This Note will trace the cases following Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co. and the confusion among t...
This Article analyzes the federal question jurisdiction issue in the context of state law claims for...
Recent developments concerning the application of the employment-at-will rule demonstrate that court...
In Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Company, the Washington Supreme Court limited the employer\u27s right...
This Note will trace the cases following Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co. and the confusion among t...
The Article begins with a brief treatment of employment at will and its modern exceptions. The Artic...
In recent years, courts in other jurisdictions have created certain exceptions to the general rule t...
Most courts hold that in-house counsel have no cause of action under public policy or retaliatory di...