Add to ORKGThe author contends that the doctrine of forfeiture of the right to assistance of counsel as a sanction for misconduct by a defendant towards the court or his counsel has no constitutional support in the principles that have defined the Sixth Amendment, is arbitrary in its application within the judicial system, and has become a refuge for courts, which have inadequately complied with established principles to protect fundamental rights
Petitioner was tried before a jury on a charge of larceny, convicted and sentenced to a penitentiary...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
On July 6, 2011, in United States v. Cavanaugh, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit hel...
In accordance with the provisions of the federal and most state constitutions, a person accused of a...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person can...
The United States Supreme Court, in making an accused\u27s right to confront witnesses a fundamental...
The Supreme Court has identified two distinct rights to an attorney that stem from the U.S. Constitu...
How much is society willing to pay to protect constitutional rights from government infringement? Ho...
The sixth amendment of The United States Constitution provides: [I]n all criminal prosecutions, the...
An indigent defendant in a state criminal prosecution is guaranteed the right to appointed counsel. ...
The appellant, a person with a long criminal record, was convicted of receiving and concealing stole...
Ten years ago, when I was a student in law school, I learned that it was difficult for a criminal de...
The right to be heard would be, in many cases, of little avail if it did not comprehend the right to...
The Treason Act of 1696 provided a right to counsel in treason cases in England and laid the framewo...
Presents the legal foundation, requirements, and relevance of the right to counsel; the states of in...
Petitioner was tried before a jury on a charge of larceny, convicted and sentenced to a penitentiary...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
On July 6, 2011, in United States v. Cavanaugh, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit hel...
In accordance with the provisions of the federal and most state constitutions, a person accused of a...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person can...
The United States Supreme Court, in making an accused\u27s right to confront witnesses a fundamental...
The Supreme Court has identified two distinct rights to an attorney that stem from the U.S. Constitu...
How much is society willing to pay to protect constitutional rights from government infringement? Ho...
The sixth amendment of The United States Constitution provides: [I]n all criminal prosecutions, the...
An indigent defendant in a state criminal prosecution is guaranteed the right to appointed counsel. ...
The appellant, a person with a long criminal record, was convicted of receiving and concealing stole...
Ten years ago, when I was a student in law school, I learned that it was difficult for a criminal de...
The right to be heard would be, in many cases, of little avail if it did not comprehend the right to...
The Treason Act of 1696 provided a right to counsel in treason cases in England and laid the framewo...
Presents the legal foundation, requirements, and relevance of the right to counsel; the states of in...
Petitioner was tried before a jury on a charge of larceny, convicted and sentenced to a penitentiary...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
On July 6, 2011, in United States v. Cavanaugh, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit hel...