Petitioner was tried before a jury on a charge of larceny, convicted and sentenced to a penitentiary term. He did not request counsel, and the court made no offer to appoint counsel. In the course of the trial, petitioner was prejudiced by his failure to object to certain errors in evidence. In a petition for habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, he alleged denial of a constitutional right of counsel. On answer, it was averred that in petitioner\u27s conduct of his own defense he displayed a familiarity with legal process in the criminal courts. A transcript of petitioner\u27s long criminal record, including eight convictions, was attached to the answer. The state supreme court denied the writ. On certiorari to the United St...
Petitioner, a nineteen year old Negro, was convicted of rape in a circuit court of Alabama. The conv...
In March 1951, defendant, a New York City policeman, was called to testify before a state grand jury...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person can...
On May 16, 1932, petitioner, then seventeen years of age, was arraigned, tried, convicted of murder ...
The appellant, a person with a long criminal record, was convicted of receiving and concealing stole...
Petitioner, under a life sentence imposed by a state court, brought a writ of habeas corpus alleging...
On May 16, 1932, petitioner, then seventeen years of age, was arraigned, tried, convicted of murder ...
Following his conviction for assault with intent to commit rape, defendant gave notice of appeal. De...
Petitioner, under a life sentence imposed by a state court, brought a writ of habeas corpus alleging...
Robbery of a Federal Reserve Bank and jeopardizing lives by the use of dangerous weapons were the ch...
This comment will not attempt to consider the guarantees of a fair trial, but will deal with the rem...
Petitioner was convicted of murder in the first degree with a recommendation for life imprisonment. ...
Undisputed evidence established that petitioner, a negro boy of fifteen, was arrested at about midni...
An indigent defendant in a state criminal prosecution is guaranteed the right to appointed counsel. ...
Petitioner, seeking to attack a conviction for illegal possession of narcotics, was granted leave to...
Petitioner, a nineteen year old Negro, was convicted of rape in a circuit court of Alabama. The conv...
In March 1951, defendant, a New York City policeman, was called to testify before a state grand jury...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person can...
On May 16, 1932, petitioner, then seventeen years of age, was arraigned, tried, convicted of murder ...
The appellant, a person with a long criminal record, was convicted of receiving and concealing stole...
Petitioner, under a life sentence imposed by a state court, brought a writ of habeas corpus alleging...
On May 16, 1932, petitioner, then seventeen years of age, was arraigned, tried, convicted of murder ...
Following his conviction for assault with intent to commit rape, defendant gave notice of appeal. De...
Petitioner, under a life sentence imposed by a state court, brought a writ of habeas corpus alleging...
Robbery of a Federal Reserve Bank and jeopardizing lives by the use of dangerous weapons were the ch...
This comment will not attempt to consider the guarantees of a fair trial, but will deal with the rem...
Petitioner was convicted of murder in the first degree with a recommendation for life imprisonment. ...
Undisputed evidence established that petitioner, a negro boy of fifteen, was arrested at about midni...
An indigent defendant in a state criminal prosecution is guaranteed the right to appointed counsel. ...
Petitioner, seeking to attack a conviction for illegal possession of narcotics, was granted leave to...
Petitioner, a nineteen year old Negro, was convicted of rape in a circuit court of Alabama. The conv...
In March 1951, defendant, a New York City policeman, was called to testify before a state grand jury...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person can...