Add to ORKGOn July 6, 2011, in United States v. Cavanaugh, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that prior, uncounseled tribal court convictions could be used to establish an element of a subsequent federal offense. In so doing, the court deemphasized the importance of reliability concerns in determining the validity of uncounseled convictions
Do the Sixth Amendment rights to appointed counsel and jury trial unconstitutionally conflict with d...
Once again the Supreme Court has spoken on the issue of the right to counsel. Within three months th...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person can...
On July 6, 2011, in United States v. Cavanaugh, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit hel...
“If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.” Since Miranda v. Arizona, that po...
If tribal courts provided competent counsel to indigent Indian defendants, Creel said, Then I would...
Native American Indians charged in tribal court criminal proceedings are not entitled to court appoi...
Indian tribes in the United States are separate sovereigns with inherent self-governing authority. A...
The author contends that the doctrine of forfeiture of the right to assistance of counsel as a sanct...
The epidemic of domestic violence committed against Native American women and the jurisdictional maz...
This Article addresses a question that seems like it would be easy to answer, but is actually quite ...
In accordance with the provisions of the federal and most state constitutions, a person accused of a...
Concerns about the reliability of criminal justice systems in foreign countries have resulted in une...
Part I of this article is a history and analysis of the federal constitutional right to effective as...
Two years ago, on the fortieth anniversary of Gideon v. Wainwright, the Constitution Project and the...
Do the Sixth Amendment rights to appointed counsel and jury trial unconstitutionally conflict with d...
Once again the Supreme Court has spoken on the issue of the right to counsel. Within three months th...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person can...
On July 6, 2011, in United States v. Cavanaugh, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit hel...
“If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.” Since Miranda v. Arizona, that po...
If tribal courts provided competent counsel to indigent Indian defendants, Creel said, Then I would...
Native American Indians charged in tribal court criminal proceedings are not entitled to court appoi...
Indian tribes in the United States are separate sovereigns with inherent self-governing authority. A...
The author contends that the doctrine of forfeiture of the right to assistance of counsel as a sanct...
The epidemic of domestic violence committed against Native American women and the jurisdictional maz...
This Article addresses a question that seems like it would be easy to answer, but is actually quite ...
In accordance with the provisions of the federal and most state constitutions, a person accused of a...
Concerns about the reliability of criminal justice systems in foreign countries have resulted in une...
Part I of this article is a history and analysis of the federal constitutional right to effective as...
Two years ago, on the fortieth anniversary of Gideon v. Wainwright, the Constitution Project and the...
Do the Sixth Amendment rights to appointed counsel and jury trial unconstitutionally conflict with d...
Once again the Supreme Court has spoken on the issue of the right to counsel. Within three months th...
The United States Supreme Court has held that absent a knowing and intelligent waiver, no person can...