Add to ORKGThis discussion poses the question: should an attorney ever provide information to an opposing party to prevent that party from suffering great harm if the information will have an adverse effect on the attorney\u27s own client? The case that sets the stage for this discussion is Spaulding v. Zimmerman, 243 Minn. 346 (1962)
Monroe Freedman’s book is largely a reiteration of his unorthodox views, previously aired in various...
When an attorney, for whatever reason-sloth, over zealous conduct, or personal greed-represents a cl...
This Article asserts that although much attention has been paid to immoral conduct and the means to ...
This discussion poses the question: should an attorney ever provide information to an opposing party...
In recent years, the subject of conflicts of interest has grown exponentially in importance to both ...
Among the challenges facing the lawyer who renders legal services to clients with limited means are ...
The article addresses a common question: What should the rules require lawyers to do when they recei...
Roger Cramton has called Spaulding v. Zimmerman one of the great gems of law teaching. The case is...
Nowhere in law do ethical considerations play a greater part or come into greater conflict than in t...
How much, if at all, can a criminal defense lawyer cooperate in his or her client\u27s decision to c...
This article acknowledges that the proper execution of a lawyer's duties will often demand the lawye...
As a member of the Bar, one can never be too conscious of the ethical duty owed to the client, to th...
In almost any area of legal counseling and advocacy, the lawyer may be faced with the dilemma of eit...
The Article seeks to use the science to determine what treatment of adverse information is most bene...
Is the attorney primarily an advocate or an officer of the court? Commentators attacked the discussi...
Monroe Freedman’s book is largely a reiteration of his unorthodox views, previously aired in various...
When an attorney, for whatever reason-sloth, over zealous conduct, or personal greed-represents a cl...
This Article asserts that although much attention has been paid to immoral conduct and the means to ...
This discussion poses the question: should an attorney ever provide information to an opposing party...
In recent years, the subject of conflicts of interest has grown exponentially in importance to both ...
Among the challenges facing the lawyer who renders legal services to clients with limited means are ...
The article addresses a common question: What should the rules require lawyers to do when they recei...
Roger Cramton has called Spaulding v. Zimmerman one of the great gems of law teaching. The case is...
Nowhere in law do ethical considerations play a greater part or come into greater conflict than in t...
How much, if at all, can a criminal defense lawyer cooperate in his or her client\u27s decision to c...
This article acknowledges that the proper execution of a lawyer's duties will often demand the lawye...
As a member of the Bar, one can never be too conscious of the ethical duty owed to the client, to th...
In almost any area of legal counseling and advocacy, the lawyer may be faced with the dilemma of eit...
The Article seeks to use the science to determine what treatment of adverse information is most bene...
Is the attorney primarily an advocate or an officer of the court? Commentators attacked the discussi...
Monroe Freedman’s book is largely a reiteration of his unorthodox views, previously aired in various...
When an attorney, for whatever reason-sloth, over zealous conduct, or personal greed-represents a cl...
This Article asserts that although much attention has been paid to immoral conduct and the means to ...