Add to ORKGMonroe Freedman’s book is largely a reiteration of his unorthodox views, previously aired in various law reviews and other professional publications, regarding ethical standards that should govern the conduct of the trial advocate. Since his positions contradict the behavioral principles codified in two publications of the American Bar Association—the Code of Professional Responsibility and the Standards Relating to the Defense Function—the author adopts the apologetic strategy of impugning both the credibility and the viability of these precepts in order to justify his contrary stance and to clear the way for its general acceptance
The title of Daniel Markovits\u27s book, A Modern Legal Ethics, gives the impression that it is a co...
The dominant ethic in the American legal profession in 1988 is the adversary ethic. The adversary et...
Daniel Markovits’ recent book, A Modern Legal Ethics: Adversary Advocacy in a Democratic Age, begins...
Monroe Freedman’s book is largely a reiteration of his unorthodox views, previously aired in various...
By Monroe H. Freedman., Indianapolis, Indiana: The Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc. 1975. Pp. 267. $12.50
mong the many controversial positions for which Monroe Freedman advocated during his illustrious car...
A large literature has emerged in recent years challenging the standard conception of adversary advo...
This Article addresses the recent proposal of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct by the America...
Professor Markovits has given us in A Modern Legal Ethics a profound, provocative, and closely argue...
Among the many controversial positions for which Monroe Freedman advocated during his illustrious ca...
This Note examines this dilemma and recent judicial approaches to it. Judges disagree about how guil...
Suppose you had to pick the two most influential events in the recent emergence of ethics as a subje...
The article celebrates the life and career of the late American law teacher Monroe H. Freedman, and ...
Is the attorney primarily an advocate or an officer of the court? Commentators attacked the discussi...
Monroe Freedman is well known as a proponent of the standard conception of legal ethics - that is,...
The title of Daniel Markovits\u27s book, A Modern Legal Ethics, gives the impression that it is a co...
The dominant ethic in the American legal profession in 1988 is the adversary ethic. The adversary et...
Daniel Markovits’ recent book, A Modern Legal Ethics: Adversary Advocacy in a Democratic Age, begins...
Monroe Freedman’s book is largely a reiteration of his unorthodox views, previously aired in various...
By Monroe H. Freedman., Indianapolis, Indiana: The Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc. 1975. Pp. 267. $12.50
mong the many controversial positions for which Monroe Freedman advocated during his illustrious car...
A large literature has emerged in recent years challenging the standard conception of adversary advo...
This Article addresses the recent proposal of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct by the America...
Professor Markovits has given us in A Modern Legal Ethics a profound, provocative, and closely argue...
Among the many controversial positions for which Monroe Freedman advocated during his illustrious ca...
This Note examines this dilemma and recent judicial approaches to it. Judges disagree about how guil...
Suppose you had to pick the two most influential events in the recent emergence of ethics as a subje...
The article celebrates the life and career of the late American law teacher Monroe H. Freedman, and ...
Is the attorney primarily an advocate or an officer of the court? Commentators attacked the discussi...
Monroe Freedman is well known as a proponent of the standard conception of legal ethics - that is,...
The title of Daniel Markovits\u27s book, A Modern Legal Ethics, gives the impression that it is a co...
The dominant ethic in the American legal profession in 1988 is the adversary ethic. The adversary et...
Daniel Markovits’ recent book, A Modern Legal Ethics: Adversary Advocacy in a Democratic Age, begins...