The style and format of court judgments have been subject to developments worldwide as courts adapt to the increasingly important issue of visibility and accessibility of judicial decisions. This article considers the evolving nature of the form of judgments within the common law focussing upon the UK Supreme Court, and analysing recent changes within a historical and comparative law perspective. It is argued that the Supreme Court should now be ready to leave the experimental stage and establish one main form of judgment, a change which will require changes to working methods, particularly in terms of deliberations and drafting
In order to make a decision, Judge has obliged under the law to conduct the article as a considerati...
This thesis proposes that the United Kingdom's constitution is changing so as to incorporate written...
Abstract: This article considers the justification for using panels of judges to make decisions in c...
In recent decades, the Supreme Court of Canada has developed a distinctive and unusual way of organi...
Judgment is simple, right? This book begs to differ. Written for all students of the law—from underg...
Throughout its history, the Supreme Court has struggled to control its caseload and to avoid becomin...
The text presents different attributes of the Supreme Court in common law and civil law systems. The...
In this book leading experts from across the common law world assess the impact of three seminal Hou...
Full text of this book is not available in the UHRAIn this text an expert law team of contributors r...
In a common law jurisdiction, according to the principle of stare decisis judges are bound to interp...
The chapter examines the extent to which judges address each other's arguments in their written judg...
Although the Supreme Court is a singular institution within the American judiciary, it remains recog...
Recently, the High Court has been criticised for its supposed increasing tendency to deliver multipl...
Although a number of different legal systems have come under the influence of the common law, these ...
Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume tha...
In order to make a decision, Judge has obliged under the law to conduct the article as a considerati...
This thesis proposes that the United Kingdom's constitution is changing so as to incorporate written...
Abstract: This article considers the justification for using panels of judges to make decisions in c...
In recent decades, the Supreme Court of Canada has developed a distinctive and unusual way of organi...
Judgment is simple, right? This book begs to differ. Written for all students of the law—from underg...
Throughout its history, the Supreme Court has struggled to control its caseload and to avoid becomin...
The text presents different attributes of the Supreme Court in common law and civil law systems. The...
In this book leading experts from across the common law world assess the impact of three seminal Hou...
Full text of this book is not available in the UHRAIn this text an expert law team of contributors r...
In a common law jurisdiction, according to the principle of stare decisis judges are bound to interp...
The chapter examines the extent to which judges address each other's arguments in their written judg...
Although the Supreme Court is a singular institution within the American judiciary, it remains recog...
Recently, the High Court has been criticised for its supposed increasing tendency to deliver multipl...
Although a number of different legal systems have come under the influence of the common law, these ...
Are judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume tha...
In order to make a decision, Judge has obliged under the law to conduct the article as a considerati...
This thesis proposes that the United Kingdom's constitution is changing so as to incorporate written...
Abstract: This article considers the justification for using panels of judges to make decisions in c...