Add to ORKGThe chapter examines the extent to which judges address each other's arguments in their written judgements. It questions the idea that judicial responsibility for decisions in the common law system is individual. It analyses the structure of the English courts, the complex dissenting process within that structure, how this process is carries through by the judicial discourse community and how the process is reflected in the reporting of dissenting judgements
Federal courts are a mainstay of the justice system in the United States. In this study, we analyze ...
The subject of this article is a dissenting opinion. Dissenting opinion, if it exists in country’s j...
By carrying out a comparative analysis of three small corpora of judgments, the paper is aimed at di...
The chapter examines the extent to which judges address each other's arguments in their written judg...
Common-law judgments tend to be more than merely judgments, for judges often make pronouncements tha...
Full text of this book is not available in the UHRAIn this text an expert law team of contributors r...
The ‘Epistemology of Disagreement’ (ED), now an established focus in epistemology, is concerned with...
This paper develops and tests a model of self-interested judicial behavior to explore the phenomenon...
This thesis aims to assess the role played by disagreement in the High Court’s constitutional l...
I argue that dissenting opinions play an important role in the formation of precedent in the context...
Although long considered alien to the civil law tradition, the publication of separate dissenting or...
none1siIn several Courts of last resort, judges are permitted to publish a dissenting opinion. This ...
This Essay explores the instrumental and normative considerations that prompt judges to publish sepa...
In the collegial world of appellate judging, where the dominant impulse is consensus, dissents depar...
Critics of judicial dissents argue that the dissent is an exercise in futility that detracts from th...
Federal courts are a mainstay of the justice system in the United States. In this study, we analyze ...
The subject of this article is a dissenting opinion. Dissenting opinion, if it exists in country’s j...
By carrying out a comparative analysis of three small corpora of judgments, the paper is aimed at di...
The chapter examines the extent to which judges address each other's arguments in their written judg...
Common-law judgments tend to be more than merely judgments, for judges often make pronouncements tha...
Full text of this book is not available in the UHRAIn this text an expert law team of contributors r...
The ‘Epistemology of Disagreement’ (ED), now an established focus in epistemology, is concerned with...
This paper develops and tests a model of self-interested judicial behavior to explore the phenomenon...
This thesis aims to assess the role played by disagreement in the High Court’s constitutional l...
I argue that dissenting opinions play an important role in the formation of precedent in the context...
Although long considered alien to the civil law tradition, the publication of separate dissenting or...
none1siIn several Courts of last resort, judges are permitted to publish a dissenting opinion. This ...
This Essay explores the instrumental and normative considerations that prompt judges to publish sepa...
In the collegial world of appellate judging, where the dominant impulse is consensus, dissents depar...
Critics of judicial dissents argue that the dissent is an exercise in futility that detracts from th...
Federal courts are a mainstay of the justice system in the United States. In this study, we analyze ...
The subject of this article is a dissenting opinion. Dissenting opinion, if it exists in country’s j...
By carrying out a comparative analysis of three small corpora of judgments, the paper is aimed at di...