The standard theories of cooperation in humans, which depend on repeated interaction and reputation effects among self-regarding agents, are inadequate. Strong reciprocity, a predisposition to participate in costly cooperation and the punishment, fosters cooperation where self-regarding behaviors fail. The effectiveness of socially coordinated punishment depends on individual motivations to participate, which are based on strong reciprocity motives. The relative infrequency of high-cost punishment is a result of the ubiquity of strong reciprocity, not its absence
Strong reciprocity explains prosocial cooperation by the presence of individuals who incur costs to ...
Indirect reciprocity1, 2, 3, 4, 5 is a key mechanism for the evolution of human cooperation. Our beh...
Explaining altruistic cooperation is one of the greatest challenges faced by sociologists, economist...
The standard theories of cooperation in humans, which depend on repeated interaction and reputation ...
Abstract: Economists and biologists have proposed a distinction between two mechanisms – “strong ” a...
Economists and biologists have proposed a distinction between two mechanisms strong and weak recipro...
This paper provides strong evidence challenging the self-interest assumption that dominates the beha...
This paper provides strong evidence challenging the self-interest assumption that dominates the beha...
The evolution of large-scale cooperation among strangers is a fundamental unanswered question in the...
Strong reciprocity explains prosocial cooperation by the presence of individuals who incur costs to ...
Both laboratory and field evidence suggest that people tend to voluntarily incur costs to punish non...
Human cooperation in social dilemmas challenges researchers from various disciplines. Here we combin...
ABSTRACT. This article focuses on the explanations of human cooperation that dominate the fields of ...
Strong negative reciprocity, that is, sanctions imposed on norm violators at the punisher’s own expe...
Strong negative reciprocity, that is, sanctions imposed on norm violators at the punisher’s own expe...
Strong reciprocity explains prosocial cooperation by the presence of individuals who incur costs to ...
Indirect reciprocity1, 2, 3, 4, 5 is a key mechanism for the evolution of human cooperation. Our beh...
Explaining altruistic cooperation is one of the greatest challenges faced by sociologists, economist...
The standard theories of cooperation in humans, which depend on repeated interaction and reputation ...
Abstract: Economists and biologists have proposed a distinction between two mechanisms – “strong ” a...
Economists and biologists have proposed a distinction between two mechanisms strong and weak recipro...
This paper provides strong evidence challenging the self-interest assumption that dominates the beha...
This paper provides strong evidence challenging the self-interest assumption that dominates the beha...
The evolution of large-scale cooperation among strangers is a fundamental unanswered question in the...
Strong reciprocity explains prosocial cooperation by the presence of individuals who incur costs to ...
Both laboratory and field evidence suggest that people tend to voluntarily incur costs to punish non...
Human cooperation in social dilemmas challenges researchers from various disciplines. Here we combin...
ABSTRACT. This article focuses on the explanations of human cooperation that dominate the fields of ...
Strong negative reciprocity, that is, sanctions imposed on norm violators at the punisher’s own expe...
Strong negative reciprocity, that is, sanctions imposed on norm violators at the punisher’s own expe...
Strong reciprocity explains prosocial cooperation by the presence of individuals who incur costs to ...
Indirect reciprocity1, 2, 3, 4, 5 is a key mechanism for the evolution of human cooperation. Our beh...
Explaining altruistic cooperation is one of the greatest challenges faced by sociologists, economist...