Results are reported according to both probe point-of-view (ProbePOV; top) and Region point-of-view (RegionPOV; bottom) metrics.</p
In part (A) the ROC curves of the two methods are relative to the prediction of increasing and decre...
<p>Average (across 10 cross-validation folds and 500 replicates) true positive rate (TPR), false neg...
<p>TPR-FPR is the difference between the true positives and false positives, which reaches the highe...
<p>False discovery rate (FDR) and false negative rate (FNR) are reported together with true positive...
<p>The fold changes of DE genes are fixed at 1.5 (half of the DE genes are over-expressed and the ot...
<p>On each curve, we marked the position corresponding to a reported FDR of 10% with a cross. The fo...
<p>Simulation results: The number of true positives and false positives detected by CPBayes at diffe...
<p>The four panels (Fig 4a, Fig 4b, Fig 4c, Fig 4d) show the average power, number of false positive...
<p>Shown are FPRs under the null hypothesis of no phenotypic effect, estimated by resampling simulat...
<p>Performance plot of one-sample significance tests under different simulation settings. Traces sho...
<p>Simulation results: The number of true positives and false positives detected by CPBayes and ASSE...
Estimated true positive rate (TPR) and average false positive rate (FPR) in percentages by pathogen ...
<p>We see the percentage of false positive using various methods. Experiments: unit-mean; quantile; ...
Number of true positives (TP) and false positives (FP) found in the different simulations: with and ...
<p>Shown are FPRs under the null hypothesis of no phenotypic effect, estimated by resampling control...
In part (A) the ROC curves of the two methods are relative to the prediction of increasing and decre...
<p>Average (across 10 cross-validation folds and 500 replicates) true positive rate (TPR), false neg...
<p>TPR-FPR is the difference between the true positives and false positives, which reaches the highe...
<p>False discovery rate (FDR) and false negative rate (FNR) are reported together with true positive...
<p>The fold changes of DE genes are fixed at 1.5 (half of the DE genes are over-expressed and the ot...
<p>On each curve, we marked the position corresponding to a reported FDR of 10% with a cross. The fo...
<p>Simulation results: The number of true positives and false positives detected by CPBayes at diffe...
<p>The four panels (Fig 4a, Fig 4b, Fig 4c, Fig 4d) show the average power, number of false positive...
<p>Shown are FPRs under the null hypothesis of no phenotypic effect, estimated by resampling simulat...
<p>Performance plot of one-sample significance tests under different simulation settings. Traces sho...
<p>Simulation results: The number of true positives and false positives detected by CPBayes and ASSE...
Estimated true positive rate (TPR) and average false positive rate (FPR) in percentages by pathogen ...
<p>We see the percentage of false positive using various methods. Experiments: unit-mean; quantile; ...
Number of true positives (TP) and false positives (FP) found in the different simulations: with and ...
<p>Shown are FPRs under the null hypothesis of no phenotypic effect, estimated by resampling control...
In part (A) the ROC curves of the two methods are relative to the prediction of increasing and decre...
<p>Average (across 10 cross-validation folds and 500 replicates) true positive rate (TPR), false neg...
<p>TPR-FPR is the difference between the true positives and false positives, which reaches the highe...
DOI
Add to ORKG