False-positive rate (FPR) analysis for human ES cells (H3K27me3 data from ENCODE Broad database) for the two replicates.

Nishanth Ulhas Nair (144976)
Avinash Das Sahu (144977)
Philipp Bucher (8281)
Bernard M. E. Moret (144983)

Publication date

August 2012

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0039573.t003

Abstract

<p>We see the percentage of false positive using various methods. Experiments: unit-mean; quantile; MACS peak finder; ChIPDiff; Rank normalization; two-stage unit-mean; ChIPnorm. The thresholds used are same as those in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0039573#pone-0039573-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>.</p

Extracted data

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

False-positive rate (FPR) analysis for human ES cells (H3K27me3 data from ENCODE Broad database) for the two replicates.

Abstract

Extracted data

False-positive rate (FPR) analysis for human ES cells (H3K27me3 data from ENCODE Broad database) for the two replicates.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items