Additional file 3: Figure S3. Relationship between observed heterozygosity versus (left) ROH coverage or (right) within-population allele-sharing distances. Red and dark blue indicate insular and continental breeds, respectively, with high homozygosity. Pink and light blue indicate insular and continental breeds, respectively, with low or modest homozygosity
Additional file 3: Figure S1. Plot of FIS values. Red dots identify populations with statistically s...
Additional file 4. Graphical representation of ROH and iHS results at the breed level of the signals...
Distribution of hapFLK values; Figure S2. Distribution of hapFLK p-values, and Figure S3. Distributi...
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Geographic locations of the insular and continental breeds considered ...
Additional file 2: Figure S2. PCA plot of 25 insular and continental goats for coordinate PC1 agains...
Additional file 4: Table S1. Spearman correlation analysis between genomic inbreeding derived from R...
Additional file 3. Comparison of ROH across the breeds raised in different countries. The higher the...
Additional file 5: Table S2. Inbreeding coefficients (i.e. Fhet, Fhat1, Fhat2 and Fhat3) for populat...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Animals used for the analyses. Breed symbol, name and number (N). The c...
The AdaptMap consortium.[Background]: Patterns of homozygosity can be influenced by several factors,...
Additional file 2: Table S2. Descriptive statistics of the genetic diversity of the 20 microsatellit...
BACKGROUND: Genetic isolation of breeds may result in a significant loss of diversity and have conse...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary statistics calculated over the whole set of AdaptMap goat popul...
Additional file 3: Table S1. Environmental variables considered for the landscape genomic analysis. ...
Additional file 3: Figure S1. Plot of FIS values. Red dots identify populations with statistically s...
Additional file 4. Graphical representation of ROH and iHS results at the breed level of the signals...
Distribution of hapFLK values; Figure S2. Distribution of hapFLK p-values, and Figure S3. Distributi...
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Geographic locations of the insular and continental breeds considered ...
Additional file 2: Figure S2. PCA plot of 25 insular and continental goats for coordinate PC1 agains...
Additional file 4: Table S1. Spearman correlation analysis between genomic inbreeding derived from R...
Additional file 3. Comparison of ROH across the breeds raised in different countries. The higher the...
Additional file 5: Table S2. Inbreeding coefficients (i.e. Fhet, Fhat1, Fhat2 and Fhat3) for populat...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Animals used for the analyses. Breed symbol, name and number (N). The c...
The AdaptMap consortium.[Background]: Patterns of homozygosity can be influenced by several factors,...
Additional file 2: Table S2. Descriptive statistics of the genetic diversity of the 20 microsatellit...
BACKGROUND: Genetic isolation of breeds may result in a significant loss of diversity and have conse...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary statistics calculated over the whole set of AdaptMap goat popul...
Additional file 3: Table S1. Environmental variables considered for the landscape genomic analysis. ...
Additional file 3: Figure S1. Plot of FIS values. Red dots identify populations with statistically s...
Additional file 4. Graphical representation of ROH and iHS results at the breed level of the signals...
Distribution of hapFLK values; Figure S2. Distribution of hapFLK p-values, and Figure S3. Distributi...