Additional file 2: Figure S2. PCA plot of 25 insular and continental goats for coordinate PC1 against PC2, PC3 and PC4 averaged across individuals. Red and dark blue indicate insular and continental breeds, respectively, with high homozygosity. Pink and light blue indicate insular and continental breeds, respectively, with low or modest homozygosity
Additional file 5. Genotype distribution of the SNPs detected in the landscape genomics analysis bas...
The AdaptMap consortium.[Background]: Patterns of homozygosity can be influenced by several factors,...
Additional file 4. Graphical representation of ROH and iHS results at the breed level of the signals...
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Geographic locations of the insular and continental breeds considered ...
Additional file 3: Figure S3. Relationship between observed heterozygosity versus (left) ROH coverag...
Additional file 5: Table S2. Inbreeding coefficients (i.e. Fhet, Fhat1, Fhat2 and Fhat3) for populat...
Additional file 4: Table S1. Spearman correlation analysis between genomic inbreeding derived from R...
Additional file 3. Comparison of ROH across the breeds raised in different countries. The higher the...
Additional file 2: Figure S1. MDS plot of the breeds, grouped by production purpose: milk, meat and ...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Animals used for the analyses. Breed symbol, name and number (N). The c...
Additional file 2: Table S2. Descriptive statistics of the genetic diversity of the 20 microsatellit...
a) Spatial PCA (sPCA) Analysis of Algerian and Moroccan goat breeds; b) eigenvalues for each global ...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary statistics calculated over the whole set of AdaptMap goat popul...
Distribution of hapFLK values; Figure S2. Distribution of hapFLK p-values, and Figure S3. Distributi...
Additional file 3: Table S1. Environmental variables considered for the landscape genomic analysis. ...
Additional file 5. Genotype distribution of the SNPs detected in the landscape genomics analysis bas...
The AdaptMap consortium.[Background]: Patterns of homozygosity can be influenced by several factors,...
Additional file 4. Graphical representation of ROH and iHS results at the breed level of the signals...
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Geographic locations of the insular and continental breeds considered ...
Additional file 3: Figure S3. Relationship between observed heterozygosity versus (left) ROH coverag...
Additional file 5: Table S2. Inbreeding coefficients (i.e. Fhet, Fhat1, Fhat2 and Fhat3) for populat...
Additional file 4: Table S1. Spearman correlation analysis between genomic inbreeding derived from R...
Additional file 3. Comparison of ROH across the breeds raised in different countries. The higher the...
Additional file 2: Figure S1. MDS plot of the breeds, grouped by production purpose: milk, meat and ...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Animals used for the analyses. Breed symbol, name and number (N). The c...
Additional file 2: Table S2. Descriptive statistics of the genetic diversity of the 20 microsatellit...
a) Spatial PCA (sPCA) Analysis of Algerian and Moroccan goat breeds; b) eigenvalues for each global ...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary statistics calculated over the whole set of AdaptMap goat popul...
Distribution of hapFLK values; Figure S2. Distribution of hapFLK p-values, and Figure S3. Distributi...
Additional file 3: Table S1. Environmental variables considered for the landscape genomic analysis. ...
Additional file 5. Genotype distribution of the SNPs detected in the landscape genomics analysis bas...
The AdaptMap consortium.[Background]: Patterns of homozygosity can be influenced by several factors,...
Additional file 4. Graphical representation of ROH and iHS results at the breed level of the signals...