Additional file 4. Graphical representation of ROH and iHS results at the breed level of the signals FLK and hapFLK in the sub continental groups. Left panel: FLK (points) and hapFLK (line) signatures, with as header the chromosomal region investigated. Middle panels: ROH signatures. Right panels: iHS signatures [see Additional file 2
Additional file 3: Figure S3. Relationship between observed heterozygosity versus (left) ROH coverag...
Table S5. Goat haplogroup frequencies based on modern and ancient control-region mtDNA data from thi...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary statistics calculated over the whole set of AdaptMap goat popul...
Additional file 3: Table S1. Environmental variables considered for the landscape genomic analysis. ...
Additional file 1. Treemix plots. Each page shows the output of a continental/sub-continental grou
Additional file 2: Figure S1. MDS plot of the breeds, grouped by production purpose: milk, meat and ...
Additional file 5. Genotype distribution of the SNPs detected in the landscape genomics analysis bas...
Additional file 3. Comparison of ROH across the breeds raised in different countries. The higher the...
Additional file 4: Table S1. Spearman correlation analysis between genomic inbreeding derived from R...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Animals used for the analyses. Breed symbol, name and number (N). The c...
Background: Since goat was domesticated 10,000 years ago, many factors have contributed to the diffe...
Distribution of hapFLK values; Figure S2. Distribution of hapFLK p-values, and Figure S3. Distributi...
Background: Since goat was domesticated 10,000 years ago, many factors have contributed to the diffe...
Background: Since goat was domesticated 10,000 years ago, many factors have contributed to the diffe...
Additional file 11: Figure S5. MDS plots of Dimensions 1 versus 2 (panel a) and 1 versus 3 (panel b)...
Additional file 3: Figure S3. Relationship between observed heterozygosity versus (left) ROH coverag...
Table S5. Goat haplogroup frequencies based on modern and ancient control-region mtDNA data from thi...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary statistics calculated over the whole set of AdaptMap goat popul...
Additional file 3: Table S1. Environmental variables considered for the landscape genomic analysis. ...
Additional file 1. Treemix plots. Each page shows the output of a continental/sub-continental grou
Additional file 2: Figure S1. MDS plot of the breeds, grouped by production purpose: milk, meat and ...
Additional file 5. Genotype distribution of the SNPs detected in the landscape genomics analysis bas...
Additional file 3. Comparison of ROH across the breeds raised in different countries. The higher the...
Additional file 4: Table S1. Spearman correlation analysis between genomic inbreeding derived from R...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Animals used for the analyses. Breed symbol, name and number (N). The c...
Background: Since goat was domesticated 10,000 years ago, many factors have contributed to the diffe...
Distribution of hapFLK values; Figure S2. Distribution of hapFLK p-values, and Figure S3. Distributi...
Background: Since goat was domesticated 10,000 years ago, many factors have contributed to the diffe...
Background: Since goat was domesticated 10,000 years ago, many factors have contributed to the diffe...
Additional file 11: Figure S5. MDS plots of Dimensions 1 versus 2 (panel a) and 1 versus 3 (panel b)...
Additional file 3: Figure S3. Relationship between observed heterozygosity versus (left) ROH coverag...
Table S5. Goat haplogroup frequencies based on modern and ancient control-region mtDNA data from thi...
Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary statistics calculated over the whole set of AdaptMap goat popul...