The modern Chinese scholars’ Japanese experience? comparing Japanese viewpoints among Liang Qichao, Lien Hsien Tang and Dai Qitao

本文針對梁?超、林獻堂、戴季陶等三位近代中國知識份子的日本經驗，從比較的觀點分析他們在近代化的過程中的思想變遷，進而探討其日本觀之異同。主要論述內容為（一）以臺灣被日本殖民的時空為範疇，針對梁?超的〈遊臺灣書牘〉、〈臺灣雜詩〉及相關書簡、詩文、分析其殖民及被殖民的「自—他」思想主張；（二）從林獻堂對傳統中華文化的教養與自負，及追求臺灣人不被同化、力爭平等、自主地位的角度，論析他與梁啟超、板垣退助、佐藤春夫等人的思想交流；（三）針對戴季陶撰寫《我的日本觀》、《日本論》的動機及內容，分析其武士道思想的變遷、信仰與革命思想的關連性；（四）探討三位知識份子對吸收外來思想的同調與異趣，並分析他們日本觀的形成與「近代性」的關連性及其意義。According to the Japanese experience of three modern Chinese scholars – Liang Qichao, Lin Hsien Tang and Dai Qitao, this study analyzed their thoughts on convergence through modernization from a comparative viewpoint to further discuss the similarity and divergence among their thoughts on Japan. The contents of discussion include（1）the analysis of Liang Qichao’s colonial viewpoint “self-others” during Japanese colonial period through his works of “Taiwan Voyage” and “Taiwan Poetry;（2）the analysis of Lin Hsien Tang’s thoughts communication with Liang Qichao, Itagaki Taisuke and Satou Haruo from the viewpoints of Lin Hsien Tang’s Chinese cultural virtue and his effort to fighting for Taiwan’s equality and independence;（3）the analysis of the relationships among the convergent thinking on Bushido, the belief and the revolution thinking;（4）the discussion on the similarity and divergence among the three scholars’ assimilation of foreign thoughts