The standard epistemic justification for inclusiveness in political decision making is the Condorcet Jury Theorem, which states that the probability of a correct decision using majority rule increases in group size (given certain assumptions). Informally, majority rule acts as a mechanism to pool the information contained in the judgements of individual agents. I aim to extend the explanation of how groups of political agents track the truth. Before agents can pool the information, they first need to find truth-conducive information. Increasing group size is also important in the initial search for truth-conducive information
The contemporary theory of epistemic democracy often draws on the Condorcet Jury Theorem to formally...
The Condorcet Jury Theorem or the Miracle of Aggregation are frequently invoked to ensure the compet...
This paper constructs two distinct models of epistemic democracy and then uses those models to draw ...
The standard epistemic justification for inclusiveness in political decision making is the Condorcet...
This thesis addresses the mechanisms by which groups of agents can track the truth, particularly i...
The Federalist, justifying the Electoral College to elect the president, claimed that a small group ...
This thesis argues that, given certain assumptions, democracies are epistemically superior to other ...
One attractive feature of democracy is its ability to track the truth by information aggregation. Th...
This paper examines the claim that democratic decision making is epistemically valuable. Focussing o...
The contemporary theory of epistemic democracy often draws on the Condorcet Jury Theorem to formally...
We develop a general theory of epistemic democracy in large societies, which subsumes the classical ...
Multiple-vote majority rule is a procedure for making group decisions in which individuals weight th...
Realizing the ideal of democracy requires political inclusion for citizens. A legitimate democracy m...
The paper quantifies the amount of information aggregated by large elections under qualified majorit...
The contemporary theory of epistemic democracy often draws on the Condorcet Jury Theorem to formally...
The Condorcet Jury Theorem or the Miracle of Aggregation are frequently invoked to ensure the compet...
This paper constructs two distinct models of epistemic democracy and then uses those models to draw ...
The standard epistemic justification for inclusiveness in political decision making is the Condorcet...
This thesis addresses the mechanisms by which groups of agents can track the truth, particularly i...
The Federalist, justifying the Electoral College to elect the president, claimed that a small group ...
This thesis argues that, given certain assumptions, democracies are epistemically superior to other ...
One attractive feature of democracy is its ability to track the truth by information aggregation. Th...
This paper examines the claim that democratic decision making is epistemically valuable. Focussing o...
The contemporary theory of epistemic democracy often draws on the Condorcet Jury Theorem to formally...
We develop a general theory of epistemic democracy in large societies, which subsumes the classical ...
Multiple-vote majority rule is a procedure for making group decisions in which individuals weight th...
Realizing the ideal of democracy requires political inclusion for citizens. A legitimate democracy m...
The paper quantifies the amount of information aggregated by large elections under qualified majorit...
The contemporary theory of epistemic democracy often draws on the Condorcet Jury Theorem to formally...
The Condorcet Jury Theorem or the Miracle of Aggregation are frequently invoked to ensure the compet...
This paper constructs two distinct models of epistemic democracy and then uses those models to draw ...