Multiple-vote majority rule is a procedure for making group decisions in which individuals weight their votes on issues in accordance with how competent they are on them. When individuals are motivated by the truth and know their relative competence on different issues, multiple-vote majority rule performs nearly as well, epistemically speaking, as rule by an expert oligarchy, but is still acceptable from the point of view of equal participation in the political proces
The validity of majority rule in an election with but two candidates—and so also of Condorcet consis...
The paper investigates how voting weights should be assigned to differently sized constituencies of ...
We show that simple majority rule satisfies the Pareto property, anonymity, neutrality, and (generic...
Multiple-vote majority rule is a procedure for making group decisions in which individuals weight th...
This article provides a survey of existing studies of majority rule, outlines misconceptions of majo...
The Federalist, justifying the Electoral College to elect the president, claimed that a small group ...
The standard epistemic justification for inclusiveness in political decision making is the Condorcet...
Numerous electoral systems have been devised over the years but, in decision-making, many forums sti...
In this study I analyse the performance of a democratic decision-making rule: the weighted majority ...
The validity of majority rule in an election with but two candidates—and so also of Condorcet consis...
We study voting rules with respect to how they allow or limit a majority from dominating minorities:...
The validity of majority rule in an election with but two candidates—and of Condorcet consistency—is...
The (relative) majority rule is a benchmark collective decision norm. This paper provides a simple c...
This thesis argues that, given certain assumptions, democracies are epistemically superior to other ...
Models of single district plurality elections show that with three parties anything can happen - ext...
The validity of majority rule in an election with but two candidates—and so also of Condorcet consis...
The paper investigates how voting weights should be assigned to differently sized constituencies of ...
We show that simple majority rule satisfies the Pareto property, anonymity, neutrality, and (generic...
Multiple-vote majority rule is a procedure for making group decisions in which individuals weight th...
This article provides a survey of existing studies of majority rule, outlines misconceptions of majo...
The Federalist, justifying the Electoral College to elect the president, claimed that a small group ...
The standard epistemic justification for inclusiveness in political decision making is the Condorcet...
Numerous electoral systems have been devised over the years but, in decision-making, many forums sti...
In this study I analyse the performance of a democratic decision-making rule: the weighted majority ...
The validity of majority rule in an election with but two candidates—and so also of Condorcet consis...
We study voting rules with respect to how they allow or limit a majority from dominating minorities:...
The validity of majority rule in an election with but two candidates—and of Condorcet consistency—is...
The (relative) majority rule is a benchmark collective decision norm. This paper provides a simple c...
This thesis argues that, given certain assumptions, democracies are epistemically superior to other ...
Models of single district plurality elections show that with three parties anything can happen - ext...
The validity of majority rule in an election with but two candidates—and so also of Condorcet consis...
The paper investigates how voting weights should be assigned to differently sized constituencies of ...
We show that simple majority rule satisfies the Pareto property, anonymity, neutrality, and (generic...