This paper completes Meirowitz (2008) by analyzing the effect of a cap on political campaign spending in an environment where voters have initial preferences over political candidates. The policy implications are starkly different from the previously analyzed case where voters are indifferent between candidates in the absence of campaign spending. We find that a spending cap always favors the a priori popular candidate. This result holds irrespective of whether it is the incumbent or the challenger who is able to more effectively generate and spend contributions.Not applicabl
Political campaign spending ceilings are purported to limit the incumbent's ability to exploit his f...
Yeon-Koo Che and Ian Gale (1998) [CG, hereafter] studied the impact of imposing a cap on lobbying ex...
Positive effects of campaign spending on electoral outcomes have been found in several comparative, ...
This paper completes Meirowitz (2008) by analyzing the effect of a cap on political campaign spendi...
This paper completes Meirowitz (2008) by analyzing the effect of a cap on political campaign spendi...
This article (a) argues that campaign spending is no more effective for challeng-ers than incumbents...
Abstract: Most campaigns do not revolve around policy commitments; instead, we think of campaigns as...
In this paper, I look at potential weaknesses in the electoral competition model constructed by Herr...
This paper presents a model which captures the three main arguments for and against campaign spendin...
The results of research on the effects of political campaign expenditures on congressional elections...
In a campaign spending contest model, this paper investigates whether the sources of incumbency adv...
In this paper, I replicate Erikson and Palfrey (2000) who propose that the simultaneity problem in m...
In a campaign spending contest framework, we investigate the potency of frequently cited sources of ...
Previous studies indicate that campaign spending is not a significant factor in determining an incu...
Objective This article seeks to explain the puzzle of why incumbents spend so much on campaigns desp...
Political campaign spending ceilings are purported to limit the incumbent's ability to exploit his f...
Yeon-Koo Che and Ian Gale (1998) [CG, hereafter] studied the impact of imposing a cap on lobbying ex...
Positive effects of campaign spending on electoral outcomes have been found in several comparative, ...
This paper completes Meirowitz (2008) by analyzing the effect of a cap on political campaign spendi...
This paper completes Meirowitz (2008) by analyzing the effect of a cap on political campaign spendi...
This article (a) argues that campaign spending is no more effective for challeng-ers than incumbents...
Abstract: Most campaigns do not revolve around policy commitments; instead, we think of campaigns as...
In this paper, I look at potential weaknesses in the electoral competition model constructed by Herr...
This paper presents a model which captures the three main arguments for and against campaign spendin...
The results of research on the effects of political campaign expenditures on congressional elections...
In a campaign spending contest model, this paper investigates whether the sources of incumbency adv...
In this paper, I replicate Erikson and Palfrey (2000) who propose that the simultaneity problem in m...
In a campaign spending contest framework, we investigate the potency of frequently cited sources of ...
Previous studies indicate that campaign spending is not a significant factor in determining an incu...
Objective This article seeks to explain the puzzle of why incumbents spend so much on campaigns desp...
Political campaign spending ceilings are purported to limit the incumbent's ability to exploit his f...
Yeon-Koo Che and Ian Gale (1998) [CG, hereafter] studied the impact of imposing a cap on lobbying ex...
Positive effects of campaign spending on electoral outcomes have been found in several comparative, ...