In a campaign spending contest model, this paper investigates whether the sources of incumbency advantage are able to generate the observed pattern of campaign spending and incumbent reelection rates in US elections and assesses the degree to which campaign finance reform can mitigate the negative repercussions of incumbency advantage. The paper extends the existing literature by allowing the electoral benefit to the candidate’s visibility to be stochastic which is intuitively appealing since one dollar of extra spending should not take a candidate from a certain loser to a certain winner. Officeholders’ ability to generate free media exposure alone is shown to be unable to match empirical regularities. Incumbent’s superior fundrais...
I present a model of repeated electoral competition between two parties. A part of the electorate vo...
Objective This article seeks to explain the puzzle of why incumbents spend so much on campaigns desp...
This article (a) argues that campaign spending is no more effective for challeng-ers than incumbents...
In a campaign spending contest model, this paper investigates whether the sources of incumbency adv...
In a campaign spending contest framework, we investigate the potency of frequently cited sources of ...
Abstract: Most campaigns do not revolve around policy commitments; instead, we think of campaigns as...
This paper presents a model which captures the three main arguments for and against campaign spendin...
This paper estimates the effects of incumbent spending and challenger spending in U.S. House electio...
In this article, we use a regression discontinuity design to estimate the causal effect of incumbenc...
In estimating incumbency advantage and campaign spending effect, simultaneity problem is composed of...
A puzzle in research on campaign spending is that while expenditure is positively related to votes w...
We develop a model that calls into question whether some key sources of incumbency advantage frequen...
This paper takes a game-theoretic approach to the analysis of the spending-votes relationship in Con...
The existing formal studies on the incumbency advantage do not take strategicchoices of electoral ch...
The major purpose of this study was to test the notion that spending large sums of money on broadcas...
I present a model of repeated electoral competition between two parties. A part of the electorate vo...
Objective This article seeks to explain the puzzle of why incumbents spend so much on campaigns desp...
This article (a) argues that campaign spending is no more effective for challeng-ers than incumbents...
In a campaign spending contest model, this paper investigates whether the sources of incumbency adv...
In a campaign spending contest framework, we investigate the potency of frequently cited sources of ...
Abstract: Most campaigns do not revolve around policy commitments; instead, we think of campaigns as...
This paper presents a model which captures the three main arguments for and against campaign spendin...
This paper estimates the effects of incumbent spending and challenger spending in U.S. House electio...
In this article, we use a regression discontinuity design to estimate the causal effect of incumbenc...
In estimating incumbency advantage and campaign spending effect, simultaneity problem is composed of...
A puzzle in research on campaign spending is that while expenditure is positively related to votes w...
We develop a model that calls into question whether some key sources of incumbency advantage frequen...
This paper takes a game-theoretic approach to the analysis of the spending-votes relationship in Con...
The existing formal studies on the incumbency advantage do not take strategicchoices of electoral ch...
The major purpose of this study was to test the notion that spending large sums of money on broadcas...
I present a model of repeated electoral competition between two parties. A part of the electorate vo...
Objective This article seeks to explain the puzzle of why incumbents spend so much on campaigns desp...
This article (a) argues that campaign spending is no more effective for challeng-ers than incumbents...