<p>A. The fold changes were calculated using the ΔΔCt comparative quantification method. Mmu-miR-141 was not detected in “control mice” (SD), hence no fold change was calculated. We identified an agreement between the microarrays and the qPCR results. B. Scatterplot and Correlation between qPCR and microarrays (Pearson's correlation = 0.888).</p
<p>Correlation between microarray (x-axis) and qPCR (y-axis) data (Log<sub>10</sub> fold-change) fro...
<p>Relative differences were calculated according to the delta-delta Ct method. Microarray data was ...
<p>Y-axis shows mRNA expression levels [–DCt values (Ct reference–Ct target)] derived from qPCR expe...
<p>(<b>A</b>) RT-qPCR of the five miRNAs (hsa-miR-181a, hsa-miR-769-5p, hsa-miR-361-5p, hsa-miR-1304...
<p>For genes tested by qPCR, differential expression in damaged vs. contralateral neurons was compar...
<p>Pearson’s correlation r = 0.86 and <i>p</i><0.01. Circles represent individual genes. If more tha...
<p>The same RNA used for Agilent microarrays was examined by QRTPCR. All fold changes were calculate...
<p>miR-423-3p, miR-128-3p, and miR-301a-3p were selected for qPCR validation. Mean ± SEM (n = 4) of ...
<p>NA- not available</p><p>A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.67 was obtained when comparing the...
<p>Median log<sub>2</sub> fold change expression levels of the 14 most up-regulated and 11 most down...
<p>Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05, Student’s t-test) compared to P...
<p><i>A</i>, Gene expression fold changes indicated by microarray and qPCR. Eighteen genes (listed o...
<p>Selected miRNA expression profile was validated in liver, spleen and lung between <i>M. fortis</i...
<p>The green bars represent gene expression quantities of control and DEHP-treatment groups microarr...
<p>Comparison of miRNA expression fold changes between microarray and RT-qPCR.</p
<p>Correlation between microarray (x-axis) and qPCR (y-axis) data (Log<sub>10</sub> fold-change) fro...
<p>Relative differences were calculated according to the delta-delta Ct method. Microarray data was ...
<p>Y-axis shows mRNA expression levels [–DCt values (Ct reference–Ct target)] derived from qPCR expe...
<p>(<b>A</b>) RT-qPCR of the five miRNAs (hsa-miR-181a, hsa-miR-769-5p, hsa-miR-361-5p, hsa-miR-1304...
<p>For genes tested by qPCR, differential expression in damaged vs. contralateral neurons was compar...
<p>Pearson’s correlation r = 0.86 and <i>p</i><0.01. Circles represent individual genes. If more tha...
<p>The same RNA used for Agilent microarrays was examined by QRTPCR. All fold changes were calculate...
<p>miR-423-3p, miR-128-3p, and miR-301a-3p were selected for qPCR validation. Mean ± SEM (n = 4) of ...
<p>NA- not available</p><p>A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.67 was obtained when comparing the...
<p>Median log<sub>2</sub> fold change expression levels of the 14 most up-regulated and 11 most down...
<p>Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p<0.05, Student’s t-test) compared to P...
<p><i>A</i>, Gene expression fold changes indicated by microarray and qPCR. Eighteen genes (listed o...
<p>Selected miRNA expression profile was validated in liver, spleen and lung between <i>M. fortis</i...
<p>The green bars represent gene expression quantities of control and DEHP-treatment groups microarr...
<p>Comparison of miRNA expression fold changes between microarray and RT-qPCR.</p
<p>Correlation between microarray (x-axis) and qPCR (y-axis) data (Log<sub>10</sub> fold-change) fro...
<p>Relative differences were calculated according to the delta-delta Ct method. Microarray data was ...
<p>Y-axis shows mRNA expression levels [–DCt values (Ct reference–Ct target)] derived from qPCR expe...