<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is conditional on T1 performance. Error bars represent standard errors of the means. Abbreviations: T1, first target; T2, second target; SOA, stimulus onset asynchrony.</p
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
<p>T1 accuracy did not differ between cued and uncued trials. Error bars show standard errors of the...
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p>Predicted probability of correct T1 identification as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SO...
<p>Paired <i>t</i>-tests comparisons showed that when the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) is short (...
<p>Accuracies are shown for lags 3 and 8 across four SOA conditions: 30 msec (a), 60 msec (b), 90 ms...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 (dotted lines) and T2 given correct report of T1 (solid line...
<p>(A) Mean percentage correct report of T1 in the standard condition (Experiment 1), rotated target...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p><i>Left</i>: Mean categorization performance plotted as function of SOA latency corrected for cha...
<p>(A) Mean percentage correct report of T1 in the standard, rotated targets, and rotated distractor...
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
<p>T1 accuracy did not differ between cued and uncued trials. Error bars show standard errors of the...
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p>Predicted probability of correct T1 identification as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SO...
<p>Paired <i>t</i>-tests comparisons showed that when the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) is short (...
<p>Accuracies are shown for lags 3 and 8 across four SOA conditions: 30 msec (a), 60 msec (b), 90 ms...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 (dotted lines) and T2 given correct report of T1 (solid line...
<p>(A) Mean percentage correct report of T1 in the standard condition (Experiment 1), rotated target...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p><i>Left</i>: Mean categorization performance plotted as function of SOA latency corrected for cha...
<p>(A) Mean percentage correct report of T1 in the standard, rotated targets, and rotated distractor...
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
<p>T1 accuracy did not differ between cued and uncued trials. Error bars show standard errors of the...
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
DOI
Add to ORKG