<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the two auditory targets, for non-musicians and musicians. Error bars reflect upper and lower confidence limits of the model.</p
<p>Individuals with musical experience perform better on a tapping task in comparison to individuals...
<p>Predicted versus perceived dissimilarity as calculated from (A) firing rates, and (B) ISIs. Each ...
Grand average proportion of correct responses during the follow-up auditory-only test blocks for eac...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p>Predicted probability of correct T1 identification as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SO...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>The estimates of the fixed effects are given in log odds.</p><p>The estimates and z-values of the...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p><i>Left</i>: Mean categorization performance plotted as function of SOA latency corrected for cha...
<p>Threshold: AlphaSim corrected at p<0.05 by taking into account peak voxel significance (threshold...
Predictions about forthcoming auditory events can be established on the basis of preceding visual in...
International audienceBecause musicians are trained to discern sounds within complex acoustic scenes...
<p>The correlation between individual T1 accuracy in the visual modality (Experiment 2) versus audit...
<p>Individuals with musical experience perform better on a tapping task in comparison to individuals...
<p>Predicted versus perceived dissimilarity as calculated from (A) firing rates, and (B) ISIs. Each ...
Grand average proportion of correct responses during the follow-up auditory-only test blocks for eac...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p>Predicted probability of correct T1 identification as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SO...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>The estimates of the fixed effects are given in log odds.</p><p>The estimates and z-values of the...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p><i>Left</i>: Mean categorization performance plotted as function of SOA latency corrected for cha...
<p>Threshold: AlphaSim corrected at p<0.05 by taking into account peak voxel significance (threshold...
Predictions about forthcoming auditory events can be established on the basis of preceding visual in...
International audienceBecause musicians are trained to discern sounds within complex acoustic scenes...
<p>The correlation between individual T1 accuracy in the visual modality (Experiment 2) versus audit...
<p>Individuals with musical experience perform better on a tapping task in comparison to individuals...
<p>Predicted versus perceived dissimilarity as calculated from (A) firing rates, and (B) ISIs. Each ...
Grand average proportion of correct responses during the follow-up auditory-only test blocks for eac...
DOI
Add to ORKG