<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces, (B) inverted faces with neutral expression, or (C) upright faces with neutral expression. Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 performance is conditional on T1 performance. Error bars represent standard errors of the means. Abbreviations: T1, first target; T2, second target; SOA, stimulus onset asynchrony.</p
(A) Accuracy scores for no (gray bars) vs. high (black bars) value distractor trials both in no vs. ...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p>Fig 6a depicts negative distractors while Fig 6b shows positive distractors. Asterisks indicates ...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>(A) Mean percentage correct report of T1 in the standard condition (Experiment 1), rotated target...
<p>(A) Mean percentage correct report of T1 in the standard, rotated targets, and rotated distractor...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 (dotted lines) and T2 given correct report of T1 (solid line...
<p>Paired <i>t</i>-tests comparisons showed that when the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) is short (...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p>Predicted probability of correct T1 identification as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SO...
<p>Fig 5a depicts basic distractors while Fig 5b shows complex distractors. The asterisk indicates s...
<p>Accuracies are shown for lags 3 and 8 across four SOA conditions: 30 msec (a), 60 msec (b), 90 ms...
(A) Schematic of trial structure for spatially overlapping forward masking. (B) Orientation discrimi...
(A) Accuracy scores for no (gray bars) vs. high (black bars) value distractor trials both in no vs. ...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p>Fig 6a depicts negative distractors while Fig 6b shows positive distractors. Asterisks indicates ...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>(A) Mean percentage correct report of T1 in the standard condition (Experiment 1), rotated target...
<p>(A) Mean percentage correct report of T1 in the standard, rotated targets, and rotated distractor...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 (dotted lines) and T2 given correct report of T1 (solid line...
<p>Paired <i>t</i>-tests comparisons showed that when the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) is short (...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p>Predicted probability of correct T1 identification as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SO...
<p>Fig 5a depicts basic distractors while Fig 5b shows complex distractors. The asterisk indicates s...
<p>Accuracies are shown for lags 3 and 8 across four SOA conditions: 30 msec (a), 60 msec (b), 90 ms...
(A) Schematic of trial structure for spatially overlapping forward masking. (B) Orientation discrimi...
(A) Accuracy scores for no (gray bars) vs. high (black bars) value distractor trials both in no vs. ...
<p>Predicted probability of T2 given correct report of T1, as a function of stimulus onset asynchron...
<p>Fig 6a depicts negative distractors while Fig 6b shows positive distractors. Asterisks indicates ...