<p>One-way ANCOVA comparing the magnitude of the ratio between FD random and FD exploited for different levels of species removals (7, 15, 22 and 29 species removals) as a function of regional species richness (logged). All terms tested against the residual.</p
<p>The dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the unburned forests.</p
<p>Level1: selectively harvesting 10% of general timber forest and 30% of other timber forest</p><p>...
It is difficult to measure the success of wildlife community restoration when the restoration goal c...
<p>Variation in the magnitude of FD loss between random versus exploited species removals with regio...
<p>Loss of FD is the difference in FD before and after the removal of 1 random species. For each reg...
<p>Species richness relative to several types of human disturbance extent, measured at two scales.</...
<p>(a) Major data sets (estimated species richness with ten protocols, observed species richness wit...
Because the biosphere is highly heterogeneous, species diversity impacts are typically assessed at l...
Because the biosphere is highly heterogeneous, species diversity impacts are typically assessed at l...
<p>The differences in species densities in the restored reaches are shown with respect to (C) taxono...
<p>Contrasts (95% credible interval) for the difference in the median number of species per site bet...
<p>Mean observed proportions of catch discarded from the ICES data in the case of the reference spec...
<p>We estimated the mean species richness for the four treatment × district combinations for each MC...
<p>Relative difference between declines in FD (A) and PD (B) under a plant-pollinator coextinction s...
Species richness was the average of number of species at each sampling area in each 5m × 5m plot. T...
<p>The dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the unburned forests.</p
<p>Level1: selectively harvesting 10% of general timber forest and 30% of other timber forest</p><p>...
It is difficult to measure the success of wildlife community restoration when the restoration goal c...
<p>Variation in the magnitude of FD loss between random versus exploited species removals with regio...
<p>Loss of FD is the difference in FD before and after the removal of 1 random species. For each reg...
<p>Species richness relative to several types of human disturbance extent, measured at two scales.</...
<p>(a) Major data sets (estimated species richness with ten protocols, observed species richness wit...
Because the biosphere is highly heterogeneous, species diversity impacts are typically assessed at l...
Because the biosphere is highly heterogeneous, species diversity impacts are typically assessed at l...
<p>The differences in species densities in the restored reaches are shown with respect to (C) taxono...
<p>Contrasts (95% credible interval) for the difference in the median number of species per site bet...
<p>Mean observed proportions of catch discarded from the ICES data in the case of the reference spec...
<p>We estimated the mean species richness for the four treatment × district combinations for each MC...
<p>Relative difference between declines in FD (A) and PD (B) under a plant-pollinator coextinction s...
Species richness was the average of number of species at each sampling area in each 5m × 5m plot. T...
<p>The dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval for the unburned forests.</p
<p>Level1: selectively harvesting 10% of general timber forest and 30% of other timber forest</p><p>...
It is difficult to measure the success of wildlife community restoration when the restoration goal c...
DOI
Add to ORKG