<p>Relative difference between declines in FD (A) and PD (B) under a plant-pollinator coextinction scenario and declines under a random scenario of plant extinctions in the absence of coextinctions. Positive and negative deviations from the random expectation are shown in green and red, respectively. Closed squares = Albrecht, closed triangles = Devoto, closed circles = Dicks, crosses = Hegland, open triangles = Junker, open circles = Memmott, diamonds = Weiner. Vertical dotted line indicates values when 50% of plant species have been lost. </p
<p>For the purpose of graphical presentation only, we need to account for size differences among spe...
The global extinction of species proceeds through the erosion of local populations. Using a 60- year...
<p>Loss of FD is the difference in FD before and after the removal of 1 random species. For each reg...
<p>Proportion of pollinator species surviving under different scenarios of plant extinction represen...
<p>One-way ANCOVA comparing the magnitude of the ratio between FD random and FD exploited for differ...
<p>Box-plots of plant generalization (“a” and “b”), mean pollinator generalization (“c” and “d”) and...
Authors examining pollinator declines frequently discuss pollination deficits, either as contemporar...
<p>Classification of crops according to their dependence on pollinators and production decrease in t...
Background and aims – Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
Background and aims – Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
Background and aims – Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
Background and aims – Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
Background and aims - Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
<p>The dashed lines represent the null models for the change from the wet to the dry season, the box...
<p>The probability density functions represent uncertainty in the measurement of the variables. For ...
<p>For the purpose of graphical presentation only, we need to account for size differences among spe...
The global extinction of species proceeds through the erosion of local populations. Using a 60- year...
<p>Loss of FD is the difference in FD before and after the removal of 1 random species. For each reg...
<p>Proportion of pollinator species surviving under different scenarios of plant extinction represen...
<p>One-way ANCOVA comparing the magnitude of the ratio between FD random and FD exploited for differ...
<p>Box-plots of plant generalization (“a” and “b”), mean pollinator generalization (“c” and “d”) and...
Authors examining pollinator declines frequently discuss pollination deficits, either as contemporar...
<p>Classification of crops according to their dependence on pollinators and production decrease in t...
Background and aims – Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
Background and aims – Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
Background and aims – Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
Background and aims – Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
Background and aims - Habitat destruction, eutrophication and fragmentation are the main drivers of ...
<p>The dashed lines represent the null models for the change from the wet to the dry season, the box...
<p>The probability density functions represent uncertainty in the measurement of the variables. For ...
<p>For the purpose of graphical presentation only, we need to account for size differences among spe...
The global extinction of species proceeds through the erosion of local populations. Using a 60- year...
<p>Loss of FD is the difference in FD before and after the removal of 1 random species. For each reg...