<p>Mean observed proportions of catch discarded from the ICES data in the case of the reference species (averaged over 2001–2010), and from fragments of data harvested from the literature in the case of all other species (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0117078#pone.0117078.s009" target="_blank">S3 Table</a>). Estimated proportion discarded averaged over 2001–2010 from the reduced model in all cases. Horizontal dashed lines indicate ± 1 s.d. of logit transformed observed data. Red circles: reference species; blue circles: all other species. Black line indicates the 1:1 relationship.</p
<p>In all cases it is shown the percentage of variance explained exclusively by each model and the s...
Scientists disagree about the nature of biodiversity change. While there is evidence for widespread ...
Fig. 3 | The temporal change in our statistical understanding of gSADs. a, The final 20-year rolling...
<p>Blue line and shading: fitted proportions and 95% credible intervals. Red symbols: observed propo...
<p>Blue line and shading: median of estimated total proportion discarded and 95% credible intervals;...
<p>Blue line and shading: median of estimated proportions and 95% credible intervals. Red symbols: q...
<p>Blue line and shading: median of estimated total discarded weight and 95% credible intervals; red...
<p>One-way ANCOVA comparing the magnitude of the ratio between FD random and FD exploited for differ...
<p>Trends of relative abundance on a scale from 0 to 5 (see text) of the species contributing mostly...
The underlying simulated decline was 30% per year over 10 years. Different columns represent differe...
<p>(a) Annual proportion of total demersal fish catch discarded (mean and 95% credible interval). (b...
<p>(A) Model 1: relationship between total faunal abundance and Distance (log<sub>2</sub> scale) at ...
<p>Species accumulation curves for remnant and control plots, for all stems ≥5 cm DBH. All species a...
<p>(A) Relationship between the proportion of eDNA sequences and proportion of biomass in the tank (...
A species abundance distribution (SAD) characterises patterns in the commonness and rarity of all sp...
<p>In all cases it is shown the percentage of variance explained exclusively by each model and the s...
Scientists disagree about the nature of biodiversity change. While there is evidence for widespread ...
Fig. 3 | The temporal change in our statistical understanding of gSADs. a, The final 20-year rolling...
<p>Blue line and shading: fitted proportions and 95% credible intervals. Red symbols: observed propo...
<p>Blue line and shading: median of estimated total proportion discarded and 95% credible intervals;...
<p>Blue line and shading: median of estimated proportions and 95% credible intervals. Red symbols: q...
<p>Blue line and shading: median of estimated total discarded weight and 95% credible intervals; red...
<p>One-way ANCOVA comparing the magnitude of the ratio between FD random and FD exploited for differ...
<p>Trends of relative abundance on a scale from 0 to 5 (see text) of the species contributing mostly...
The underlying simulated decline was 30% per year over 10 years. Different columns represent differe...
<p>(a) Annual proportion of total demersal fish catch discarded (mean and 95% credible interval). (b...
<p>(A) Model 1: relationship between total faunal abundance and Distance (log<sub>2</sub> scale) at ...
<p>Species accumulation curves for remnant and control plots, for all stems ≥5 cm DBH. All species a...
<p>(A) Relationship between the proportion of eDNA sequences and proportion of biomass in the tank (...
A species abundance distribution (SAD) characterises patterns in the commonness and rarity of all sp...
<p>In all cases it is shown the percentage of variance explained exclusively by each model and the s...
Scientists disagree about the nature of biodiversity change. While there is evidence for widespread ...
Fig. 3 | The temporal change in our statistical understanding of gSADs. a, The final 20-year rolling...