<p>(a) Empirical RT interference, averaged across participants, represents the RT difference, in ms, between distractor-present and distractor-absent trials. Salience difference, averaged across participants, was derived from detection times in the baseline salience measurement requiring a simple target-present vs. target-absent decision (see <i>Methods</i> of <i>Behavioral reaction time experiment</i>). Negative x-values indicate distractors less salient, and positive x-values distractors more salient than the target. Dots represent mean values of RT interference for each salience difference condition (<i>n</i> = 25); arrows indicate the associated standard errors. Red dots indicate significant RT interference by distractors significantly ...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms) in the MI, MC, and MN contexts for incongruent, congruent and neutral it...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Median reaction times averaged across subjects for each of the 96 target presentations...
<p>Empirical proportion of capture by the distractor, averaged across participants, represents the p...
<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for each distractor condition over the course of the ...
The data set is from a series of two eye tracking experiments testing the role of statistical learni...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
<div><p>Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably s...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
Response interference (or response conflict) refers to the phenomenon whereby response times to a ta...
A series of computer simulations using variants of a formal model of attention (Melara & Algom, 2003...
<p>A, the measurements of reaction time (RT) and accurate rate (ACC) in time discrimination task. B,...
Researchers have long debated how salient-but-irrelevant features guide visual attention. Pure stimu...
<p>A. Mean performance (% visits without nose-pokes) on the first day of conditioning across pre-exp...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms) in the MI, MC, and MN contexts for incongruent, congruent and neutral it...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Median reaction times averaged across subjects for each of the 96 target presentations...
<p>Empirical proportion of capture by the distractor, averaged across participants, represents the p...
<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for each distractor condition over the course of the ...
The data set is from a series of two eye tracking experiments testing the role of statistical learni...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
<div><p>Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably s...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
Response interference (or response conflict) refers to the phenomenon whereby response times to a ta...
A series of computer simulations using variants of a formal model of attention (Melara & Algom, 2003...
<p>A, the measurements of reaction time (RT) and accurate rate (ACC) in time discrimination task. B,...
Researchers have long debated how salient-but-irrelevant features guide visual attention. Pure stimu...
<p>A. Mean performance (% visits without nose-pokes) on the first day of conditioning across pre-exp...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
<p>Mean reaction times (ms) in the MI, MC, and MN contexts for incongruent, congruent and neutral it...
<p>(<b>A</b>) Median reaction times averaged across subjects for each of the 96 target presentations...