<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for each distractor condition over the course of the test phase. The difference in RT on trials containing a high-value vs. a low-value distractor represents the effect of learned value on salience-driven attentional capture.</p
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
Visual attention is captured by physically salient stimuli (termed salience-based attentional captur...
<p>(a) Empirical RT interference, averaged across participants, represents the RT difference, in ms,...
<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for high- and low-reward targets over the course of t...
<p>Empirical proportion of capture by the distractor, averaged across participants, represents the p...
The data set is from a series of two eye tracking experiments testing the role of statistical learni...
<p>W refers to Words, P to pseudowords (lexical category under focus), H to Hold and R to Release (s...
<p>Top. Mean response times across participants (N = 15) plotted for the attend-auditory condition (...
<p>(A) M100 and (B) sustained response amplitudes (SEM) as a function of time from condition start, ...
Reward learning is known to influence the automatic capture of attention. This study examined how th...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
<div><p>Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably s...
A series of computer simulations using variants of a formal model of attention (Melara & Algom, 2003...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
Visual attention is captured by physically salient stimuli (termed salience-based attentional captur...
<p>(a) Empirical RT interference, averaged across participants, represents the RT difference, in ms,...
<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for high- and low-reward targets over the course of t...
<p>Empirical proportion of capture by the distractor, averaged across participants, represents the p...
The data set is from a series of two eye tracking experiments testing the role of statistical learni...
<p>W refers to Words, P to pseudowords (lexical category under focus), H to Hold and R to Release (s...
<p>Top. Mean response times across participants (N = 15) plotted for the attend-auditory condition (...
<p>(A) M100 and (B) sustained response amplitudes (SEM) as a function of time from condition start, ...
Reward learning is known to influence the automatic capture of attention. This study examined how th...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
<div><p>Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably s...
A series of computer simulations using variants of a formal model of attention (Melara & Algom, 2003...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
<p>A. Hit and false alarm rates for discrimination learning. Different experimental runs were aligne...
Current accounts of attentional capture predict the most salient stimulus to be invariably selected ...
Visual attention is captured by physically salient stimuli (termed salience-based attentional captur...
DOI
Add to ORKG