<p>(<b>A</b>) The correlation between the TBP/TATA affinity as predicted <i>in silico</i> and measured <i>in vitro.</i> The coefficient of linear correlation, r, is 0.822 at a significance level of α <10<sup>−7</sup>. (<b>B</b>) The correlation between SNP-caused TBP/TATA affinity change (δ) as predicted <i>in silico</i> and measured <i>in vitro.</i> The coefficient of linear correlation, r, is 0.785 at a significance level of α<10<sup>−3</sup>. 95% confidence intervals for linear regression built using the package STATISTICA.</p
<p>Correlations were calculated based on the Pearson correlation, and p values between treatment and...
<p>Correlation analysis between prediction score for deleterious and validated nsSNPs by <i>In Vivo/...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mu...
<p>The table contains the Pearson correlation coefficients computed between the experimentally measu...
<p><i>K</i><sub>D</sub>± (standard deviation); δ - the difference between the affinity of hTBP for O...
<p>The correlation coefficient () is 0.862 (statistical significance ). The predicted affinities are...
<p>Each R<sup>2</sup> is the correlation between the predicted change in binding affinity and the ex...
<p>Coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup> values) for linear regression fits of the dependence...
<p>The use of an electrophoretic mobility shift assay for measuring hTBP/TATA affinity: (<b>A</b>) a...
*<p>indicates significant correlations.</p>†<p>denotes significant correlations that did not hold wh...
<p>Spearman rank correlation coefficients are provided in parentheses.</p>a<p>Number of proteins in ...
<div><p>The <i>r</i>- and <i>p</i>-values are indicated in each graph.</p><p>(A) Liver/brain, all da...
Reliable prediction of binding affinity changes (ΔΔG) upon mutations in protein complexes relies not...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Quantitative evaluation of protein–DNA interactio...
<p>Ranking of affinities according to Western blot intensities agrees well with affinity data obtain...
<p>Correlations were calculated based on the Pearson correlation, and p values between treatment and...
<p>Correlation analysis between prediction score for deleterious and validated nsSNPs by <i>In Vivo/...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mu...
<p>The table contains the Pearson correlation coefficients computed between the experimentally measu...
<p><i>K</i><sub>D</sub>± (standard deviation); δ - the difference between the affinity of hTBP for O...
<p>The correlation coefficient () is 0.862 (statistical significance ). The predicted affinities are...
<p>Each R<sup>2</sup> is the correlation between the predicted change in binding affinity and the ex...
<p>Coefficients of determination (R<sup>2</sup> values) for linear regression fits of the dependence...
<p>The use of an electrophoretic mobility shift assay for measuring hTBP/TATA affinity: (<b>A</b>) a...
*<p>indicates significant correlations.</p>†<p>denotes significant correlations that did not hold wh...
<p>Spearman rank correlation coefficients are provided in parentheses.</p>a<p>Number of proteins in ...
<div><p>The <i>r</i>- and <i>p</i>-values are indicated in each graph.</p><p>(A) Liver/brain, all da...
Reliable prediction of binding affinity changes (ΔΔG) upon mutations in protein complexes relies not...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Quantitative evaluation of protein–DNA interactio...
<p>Ranking of affinities according to Western blot intensities agrees well with affinity data obtain...
<p>Correlations were calculated based on the Pearson correlation, and p values between treatment and...
<p>Correlation analysis between prediction score for deleterious and validated nsSNPs by <i>In Vivo/...
<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mu...