<p>Bias-corrected means (SD) of ‘simultaneous’ responses (%) across stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) of ASD and TD participants.</p
<p><i>Note</i>. For each stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), the compatibility effect (i.e., incompatib...
<p>Mean and standard deviation (in parentheses) measures of response time, in milliseconds, for the ...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p>Mean proportion of “long” responses plotted against stimulus durations, for both ASD and TD parti...
<p>Mean proportion of “long” responses plotted against stimulus durations, for both ASD and TD parti...
<p>Proportion of participants’ ‘simultaneous’ responses plotted as a function of the stimulus onset ...
<p><i>Left</i>: Mean categorization performance plotted as function of SOA latency corrected for cha...
<p>The group performance on the reaction time (RT) task is plotted as the mean and standard deviatio...
Dashed lines represent the no mask baseline performance for the “same” (cyan) and “different” (red) ...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Mean and standard deviation (in parentheses) measures of response time, in milliseconds, for the ...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Top and bottom rows display the SJ/stimulus and TOJ/stimulus combinations, respectively. Each gra...
Dashed lines represent the no mask baseline performance for each of the 3 similarity levels, 1 “very...
<p><i>Note</i>. For each stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), the compatibility effect (i.e., incompatib...
<p>Mean and standard deviation (in parentheses) measures of response time, in milliseconds, for the ...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p>Mean proportion of “long” responses plotted against stimulus durations, for both ASD and TD parti...
<p>Mean proportion of “long” responses plotted against stimulus durations, for both ASD and TD parti...
<p>Proportion of participants’ ‘simultaneous’ responses plotted as a function of the stimulus onset ...
<p><i>Left</i>: Mean categorization performance plotted as function of SOA latency corrected for cha...
<p>The group performance on the reaction time (RT) task is plotted as the mean and standard deviatio...
Dashed lines represent the no mask baseline performance for the “same” (cyan) and “different” (red) ...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Mean and standard deviation (in parentheses) measures of response time, in milliseconds, for the ...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Top and bottom rows display the SJ/stimulus and TOJ/stimulus combinations, respectively. Each gra...
Dashed lines represent the no mask baseline performance for each of the 3 similarity levels, 1 “very...
<p><i>Note</i>. For each stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), the compatibility effect (i.e., incompatib...
<p>Mean and standard deviation (in parentheses) measures of response time, in milliseconds, for the ...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
DOI
Add to ORKG