<p><b>) for all-pairs (left) and Marcus-type (right) comparisons using normal (upper row) and log-normal (lower row) distributions (</b><b>).</b> The variance explained by the quantitative trait was set to .</p
<p>Powers were calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous trait...
<p>The mean squared errors were obtained from 100 replicated simulations. The overall proportion of ...
<p>The mean squared errors were obtained from 100 replicated simulations. The overall proportion of ...
<p><b>) for all-pairs (left) and Marcus-type (right) comparisons using normal (upper row) and log-no...
<p> <b>) simulation results for all-pairs (left) and Marcus-type (right) comparisons...
<p>The proportion of simulated traits for which the -log10(p) value of the causal SNP is above the t...
<p>The figure shows the empirical power given the significance level of 0.05. Top row: 50 variants i...
<p>For all simulations: . Panel A: Effect of sample size assuming transcribed and <i>cis</i> acting ...
<p>The residuals were calculated by generalized linear models under the Normal distributional assump...
<p>Experimentally observed relationships between the means and variances had a slope of (A). When t...
<p>A-D, KW, MLM and LM. The “Power” was defined as the detection frequency in 500 repeats for a cert...
<p>The figure shows the empirical power given the significance level of 0.05. Top row: 50 variants i...
<p>Statistical power is plotted against the PMG differences between the two comparing groups. Sigmoi...
<p>For each effect size (1,2,3,4,5 or 10% of the total variance) 100 simulations were carried out. T...
<p>The sample size is 1000. Covariance matrix of 10 traits is similar to that of 10 quantitative tra...
<p>Powers were calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous trait...
<p>The mean squared errors were obtained from 100 replicated simulations. The overall proportion of ...
<p>The mean squared errors were obtained from 100 replicated simulations. The overall proportion of ...
<p><b>) for all-pairs (left) and Marcus-type (right) comparisons using normal (upper row) and log-no...
<p> <b>) simulation results for all-pairs (left) and Marcus-type (right) comparisons...
<p>The proportion of simulated traits for which the -log10(p) value of the causal SNP is above the t...
<p>The figure shows the empirical power given the significance level of 0.05. Top row: 50 variants i...
<p>For all simulations: . Panel A: Effect of sample size assuming transcribed and <i>cis</i> acting ...
<p>The residuals were calculated by generalized linear models under the Normal distributional assump...
<p>Experimentally observed relationships between the means and variances had a slope of (A). When t...
<p>A-D, KW, MLM and LM. The “Power” was defined as the detection frequency in 500 repeats for a cert...
<p>The figure shows the empirical power given the significance level of 0.05. Top row: 50 variants i...
<p>Statistical power is plotted against the PMG differences between the two comparing groups. Sigmoi...
<p>For each effect size (1,2,3,4,5 or 10% of the total variance) 100 simulations were carried out. T...
<p>The sample size is 1000. Covariance matrix of 10 traits is similar to that of 10 quantitative tra...
<p>Powers were calculated for nominal α levels 0.05 (left) and 0.01(right) and for dichotomous trait...
<p>The mean squared errors were obtained from 100 replicated simulations. The overall proportion of ...
<p>The mean squared errors were obtained from 100 replicated simulations. The overall proportion of ...
DOI
Add to ORKG