<p>Time spent by wild-type (WT) and TgIE96 (TG) groups to enter the dark area for the Acquisition session, and 24 and 48 h afterwards, during a passive avoidance task. Values are mean ± SEM of the percentage of the time limit (5 min) employed. *, Statistical differences between groups, <i>P</i><0.05 (<i>Post hoc</i> one-way ANOVA).</p
<p>Positive t values, shown in yellow on the topographic map, imply power increases during the atten...
<p>Post-hoc results (mean difference and <i>p</i>-value) of group differences on the cognitive alexi...
<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for each distractor condition over the course of the ...
<p>Representation of the time spent by wild-type (WT) and TgIE96 (TG) groups to reach a submerged pl...
<p>Graphical representation of the indexes related to response latency (Resp Lat), maximum peak late...
t Results and Discussion intraepoch time. We conducted three independent experiments involving 24,we...
<p>(A) The first exposure of animals to the inhibitory avoidance equipment and the test performed 24...
<p>The plusses mark the mean per participant, the bars show the mean over participants and the error...
*<p>Mean time spent by participants with complete data at baseline and follow up. Participants with ...
<p><b><i>A.</i></b> Step-through passive avoidance test. The latency of the mice entering the dark c...
<p>Data shown are mean ± standard deviation. Effect sizes are Cohen d, with a negative effect sizes ...
We conducted three independent experiments involving 24,we computed a threat level 3 task (active/pa...
<p>HTA = high-trait-anxious, LTA = low-trait-anxious; Interference effect = incongruent minus ...
Mean and standard error of hit-item proportion in each time-block compared to the baseline score. A....
<p>Mean ± SEM of percentage of avoidance rate and avoidance latency in session 5 with LHb stimulatio...
<p>Positive t values, shown in yellow on the topographic map, imply power increases during the atten...
<p>Post-hoc results (mean difference and <i>p</i>-value) of group differences on the cognitive alexi...
<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for each distractor condition over the course of the ...
<p>Representation of the time spent by wild-type (WT) and TgIE96 (TG) groups to reach a submerged pl...
<p>Graphical representation of the indexes related to response latency (Resp Lat), maximum peak late...
t Results and Discussion intraepoch time. We conducted three independent experiments involving 24,we...
<p>(A) The first exposure of animals to the inhibitory avoidance equipment and the test performed 24...
<p>The plusses mark the mean per participant, the bars show the mean over participants and the error...
*<p>Mean time spent by participants with complete data at baseline and follow up. Participants with ...
<p><b><i>A.</i></b> Step-through passive avoidance test. The latency of the mice entering the dark c...
<p>Data shown are mean ± standard deviation. Effect sizes are Cohen d, with a negative effect sizes ...
We conducted three independent experiments involving 24,we computed a threat level 3 task (active/pa...
<p>HTA = high-trait-anxious, LTA = low-trait-anxious; Interference effect = incongruent minus ...
Mean and standard error of hit-item proportion in each time-block compared to the baseline score. A....
<p>Mean ± SEM of percentage of avoidance rate and avoidance latency in session 5 with LHb stimulatio...
<p>Positive t values, shown in yellow on the topographic map, imply power increases during the atten...
<p>Post-hoc results (mean difference and <i>p</i>-value) of group differences on the cognitive alexi...
<p>Mean response time ± within-subjects s.e.m. for each distractor condition over the course of the ...