<p>We compare <i>pathfinder</i> to basic eQTL mapping, with respect to the size of their credible sets, averaged across all regions. Standard errors are included next to each measurement.</p
<p>SNP effect size estimates and standard errors for eQTLs significant in both models (A, D), in the...
Anonymous SNP markers initially have very low scores on both the FPR and FNR. Correcting the assigna...
The comparison of five baseline tools in terms of the number of accurate unique alignments out of 20...
<p>We compare <i>pathfinder</i> to the technique of independently fine-mapping the two levels of dat...
<p>We compare <i>pathfinder’s</i> performance when using SNP LD from YRI vs from CEU, with respect t...
<p>Standardized path coefficients, standard errors, 95% confidence intervals (via percentile bootstr...
<p>Slope is given in seconds per risk allele. Trailmaking regression is for a subset of 345 subjects...
<p>(A) Distances from SNP to mark (B) Distances from mark to TSS (C) Distances from SNP to TSS.</p
The determination of empirical confidence intervals for the location of quantitative trait loci (QTL...
<p>(A) A fragment length of a fragment end is an explanatory variable of FL, and an average coverage...
<p>95% credible regions that do not include the origin for the first two principal axes of the genot...
<p>The mapQ varies from 0, 3, 6, 10, 13, 20, then in increments of 10 up to the maximum allowed valu...
The rank items listed under the table include the information of metrics, datasets, cancer, whether ...
<p>All mappings were performed using STAR. Mapping sensitivity is approximated by the read depth in ...
When statistical linkage to a certain chromosomal region has been found, it is of interest to develo...
<p>SNP effect size estimates and standard errors for eQTLs significant in both models (A, D), in the...
Anonymous SNP markers initially have very low scores on both the FPR and FNR. Correcting the assigna...
The comparison of five baseline tools in terms of the number of accurate unique alignments out of 20...
<p>We compare <i>pathfinder</i> to the technique of independently fine-mapping the two levels of dat...
<p>We compare <i>pathfinder’s</i> performance when using SNP LD from YRI vs from CEU, with respect t...
<p>Standardized path coefficients, standard errors, 95% confidence intervals (via percentile bootstr...
<p>Slope is given in seconds per risk allele. Trailmaking regression is for a subset of 345 subjects...
<p>(A) Distances from SNP to mark (B) Distances from mark to TSS (C) Distances from SNP to TSS.</p
The determination of empirical confidence intervals for the location of quantitative trait loci (QTL...
<p>(A) A fragment length of a fragment end is an explanatory variable of FL, and an average coverage...
<p>95% credible regions that do not include the origin for the first two principal axes of the genot...
<p>The mapQ varies from 0, 3, 6, 10, 13, 20, then in increments of 10 up to the maximum allowed valu...
The rank items listed under the table include the information of metrics, datasets, cancer, whether ...
<p>All mappings were performed using STAR. Mapping sensitivity is approximated by the read depth in ...
When statistical linkage to a certain chromosomal region has been found, it is of interest to develo...
<p>SNP effect size estimates and standard errors for eQTLs significant in both models (A, D), in the...
Anonymous SNP markers initially have very low scores on both the FPR and FNR. Correcting the assigna...
The comparison of five baseline tools in terms of the number of accurate unique alignments out of 20...
DOI
Add to ORKG