The comparison of five baseline tools in terms of the number of accurate unique alignments out of 20 million synthetic reads in each of the four datasets with different read lengths and error profiles.

Xinan Liu (5174108)
James N. MacLeod (3286986)
Jinze Liu (383649)

Open link

Publication date

August 2018

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0201554.t002

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Abstract

The comparison of five baseline tools in terms of the number of accurate unique alignments out of 20 million synthetic reads in each of the four datasets with different read lengths and error profiles.</p

Extracted data

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

The comparison of five baseline tools in terms of the number of accurate unique alignments out of 20 million synthetic reads in each of the four datasets with different read lengths and error profiles.

Abstract

Extracted data

The comparison of five baseline tools in terms of the number of accurate unique alignments out of 20 million synthetic reads in each of the four datasets with different read lengths and error profiles.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items