One of the numerous constitutional questions about which theConstitution itself tells us very little is the extent to which persons whoare not soldiers or sailors on active duty may be subjected to trial bycourt-martial. Clause 14 of article 1, section 8, says that Congressmay make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land andnaval Forces; clause 18 adds that Congress may make all Lawswhich shall be necessary and proper to that end. The fifth amendmentexempts from its requirement of grand jury indictment cases arisingin the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service intime of War or public danger. The rest is silence
In O’Callahan v. Parker, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a “service connection” requirement for court...
The Supreme Court has long held that federal adjudication before judges lacking Article III’s salary...
When a civilian supreme court for the review of court-martial convictions was first proposed in Co...
One of the numerous constitutional questions about which theConstitution itself tells us very little...
Defendants, civilian wives of servicemen living overseas, were tried and convicted of murder by mili...
A retired naval officer was charged with violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice based up...
This Note mounts a constitutional case against the recent amendment to the Uniform Code of Military ...
During the past term the Supreme Court decided three cases involving the constitutionality of court-...
Under the guise of protecting the benefits of indictment by grand jury and trial by petit jury for s...
There is often a misconception regarding the military and the procedures that it uses in order to br...
The historical limitation on the jurisdiction of courts-martial, which is solely criminal in nature,...
Nine years, one Supreme Court decision, two statutes, and a veritable mountain of popular and acad...
In October 1979, Congress exercised its "constitutional duty" -its long-recognized powers of control...
A civilian was arrested in Pennsylvania by the military police. Without any hearing before a civil c...
Petitioner, a chief petty officer in the Navy was honorably discharged on March 26, 1946, and re-enl...
In O’Callahan v. Parker, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a “service connection” requirement for court...
The Supreme Court has long held that federal adjudication before judges lacking Article III’s salary...
When a civilian supreme court for the review of court-martial convictions was first proposed in Co...
One of the numerous constitutional questions about which theConstitution itself tells us very little...
Defendants, civilian wives of servicemen living overseas, were tried and convicted of murder by mili...
A retired naval officer was charged with violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice based up...
This Note mounts a constitutional case against the recent amendment to the Uniform Code of Military ...
During the past term the Supreme Court decided three cases involving the constitutionality of court-...
Under the guise of protecting the benefits of indictment by grand jury and trial by petit jury for s...
There is often a misconception regarding the military and the procedures that it uses in order to br...
The historical limitation on the jurisdiction of courts-martial, which is solely criminal in nature,...
Nine years, one Supreme Court decision, two statutes, and a veritable mountain of popular and acad...
In October 1979, Congress exercised its "constitutional duty" -its long-recognized powers of control...
A civilian was arrested in Pennsylvania by the military police. Without any hearing before a civil c...
Petitioner, a chief petty officer in the Navy was honorably discharged on March 26, 1946, and re-enl...
In O’Callahan v. Parker, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a “service connection” requirement for court...
The Supreme Court has long held that federal adjudication before judges lacking Article III’s salary...
When a civilian supreme court for the review of court-martial convictions was first proposed in Co...