Add to ORKGThe historical limitation on the jurisdiction of courts-martial, which is solely criminal in nature, has been based in large part upon concern for overreach of military control, fear of unnecessary deprivation of constitutional protections for service members, and a general lack of confidence in military justice. The national desire for a fit and disciplined armed force has provided a counterweight to these concerns
Defendants, civilian wives of servicemen living overseas, were tried and convicted of murder by mili...
During court-martial, the commander decides on the charge, selects of the jury, and reviews the tria...
Under the guise of protecting the benefits of indictment by grand jury and trial by petit jury for s...
This article examines the statutory and judicial developments that have apparently expanded military...
In O’Callahan v. Parker, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a “service connection” requirement for court...
In June of 1969, the Supreme Court decided O\u27Callahan v. Parker, and thereby rocked the very foun...
In October 1979, Congress exercised its "constitutional duty" -its long-recognized powers of control...
Until recently, it had generally been considered that the minimum condition necessary to justify the...
During the past term the Supreme Court decided three cases involving the constitutionality of court-...
In “Military Courts and Article III,” law professor Steve Vladeck proposes a wholesale replacement o...
One of the numerous constitutional questions about which theConstitution itself tells us very little...
Control exercised by the federal civil courts over courts-martial differs from that found in other t...
Nine years, one Supreme Court decision, two statutes, and a veritable mountain of popular and acad...
A retired naval officer was charged with violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice based up...
Although the question had been tangentially noted on numerous occasions and in various contexts, unt...
Defendants, civilian wives of servicemen living overseas, were tried and convicted of murder by mili...
During court-martial, the commander decides on the charge, selects of the jury, and reviews the tria...
Under the guise of protecting the benefits of indictment by grand jury and trial by petit jury for s...
This article examines the statutory and judicial developments that have apparently expanded military...
In O’Callahan v. Parker, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a “service connection” requirement for court...
In June of 1969, the Supreme Court decided O\u27Callahan v. Parker, and thereby rocked the very foun...
In October 1979, Congress exercised its "constitutional duty" -its long-recognized powers of control...
Until recently, it had generally been considered that the minimum condition necessary to justify the...
During the past term the Supreme Court decided three cases involving the constitutionality of court-...
In “Military Courts and Article III,” law professor Steve Vladeck proposes a wholesale replacement o...
One of the numerous constitutional questions about which theConstitution itself tells us very little...
Control exercised by the federal civil courts over courts-martial differs from that found in other t...
Nine years, one Supreme Court decision, two statutes, and a veritable mountain of popular and acad...
A retired naval officer was charged with violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice based up...
Although the question had been tangentially noted on numerous occasions and in various contexts, unt...
Defendants, civilian wives of servicemen living overseas, were tried and convicted of murder by mili...
During court-martial, the commander decides on the charge, selects of the jury, and reviews the tria...
Under the guise of protecting the benefits of indictment by grand jury and trial by petit jury for s...