Under the guise of protecting the benefits of indictment by grand jury and trial by petit jury for servicemen, on June 2, 1969, the United States Supreme Court set aside a rile of constitutional law which had endured since the adoption of the Constitution by the colonies. In a decision certain to have extensive consequences, the Court in O’Callahan v. Parker held that the status of an individual for crimes committed while he is a member of the armed forces. The principle which had clearly emerged after years of challenges at its periphery suddenly tumbled
Independence of the military justice system is predicated on the premise that courts-martial are Art...
In Burch . Louisiana and Ballew v. Georgia, the Supreme Court defined the protections guaranteed by ...
This study was undertaken to examine the operation of the United States Court of Military Appeals, a...
Defendants, civilian wives of servicemen living overseas, were tried and convicted of murder by mili...
During the past term the Supreme Court decided three cases involving the constitutionality of court-...
In O’Callahan v. Parker, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a “service connection” requirement for court...
Although the question had been tangentially noted on numerous occasions and in various contexts, unt...
A retired naval officer was charged with violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice based up...
One of the numerous constitutional questions about which theConstitution itself tells us very little...
Until recently, it had generally been considered that the minimum condition necessary to justify the...
In June of 1969, the Supreme Court decided O\u27Callahan v. Parker, and thereby rocked the very foun...
A civilian was arrested in Pennsylvania by the military police. Without any hearing before a civil c...
Nine years, one Supreme Court decision, two statutes, and a veritable mountain of popular and acad...
In October 1979, Congress exercised its "constitutional duty" -its long-recognized powers of control...
Petitioner, a chief petty officer in the Navy was honorably discharged on March 26, 1946, and re-enl...
Independence of the military justice system is predicated on the premise that courts-martial are Art...
In Burch . Louisiana and Ballew v. Georgia, the Supreme Court defined the protections guaranteed by ...
This study was undertaken to examine the operation of the United States Court of Military Appeals, a...
Defendants, civilian wives of servicemen living overseas, were tried and convicted of murder by mili...
During the past term the Supreme Court decided three cases involving the constitutionality of court-...
In O’Callahan v. Parker, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted a “service connection” requirement for court...
Although the question had been tangentially noted on numerous occasions and in various contexts, unt...
A retired naval officer was charged with violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice based up...
One of the numerous constitutional questions about which theConstitution itself tells us very little...
Until recently, it had generally been considered that the minimum condition necessary to justify the...
In June of 1969, the Supreme Court decided O\u27Callahan v. Parker, and thereby rocked the very foun...
A civilian was arrested in Pennsylvania by the military police. Without any hearing before a civil c...
Nine years, one Supreme Court decision, two statutes, and a veritable mountain of popular and acad...
In October 1979, Congress exercised its "constitutional duty" -its long-recognized powers of control...
Petitioner, a chief petty officer in the Navy was honorably discharged on March 26, 1946, and re-enl...
Independence of the military justice system is predicated on the premise that courts-martial are Art...
In Burch . Louisiana and Ballew v. Georgia, the Supreme Court defined the protections guaranteed by ...
This study was undertaken to examine the operation of the United States Court of Military Appeals, a...