<p>The final concentration of IS6110 DNA in the eluate following magnetic bead-based extraction of 3 and 5 mL spiked urine samples is significantly higher than the IS6110 DNA concentration in the eluate following the extraction of 1 mL samples (mean ± s.d., n = 3); * denotes statistically different from 1 mL sample.</p
<p>Illustration of relative DNA concentrations of samples 1–10 measured by the NanoDrop 2000c spectr...
<p>There is no significant difference in DNA recovery using the lyophilized urine collection pipette...
<p>Means and 95% CI are shown for every combination of substrate and bait, once records >60 ng μl<su...
<p>The percentage of DNA recovered from 1 mL urine samples increases as the concentration of magneti...
<p>Though both are significantly higher than the unextracted sample, which is undetectable by PCR, t...
<p>The concentration of Pt-DACH was 60 µM. Each data point was the mean of four independent measurem...
Due to the presence of PCR inhibitors, PCR cannot be used directly on most clinical samples, includi...
<p>Error bars are standard deviation. LOQ are limit of quantification of the spectrophotometer.</p
*<p>OD<sub>260 nm</sub> of 1 equals 50 ng/µl.</p>a<p>dilution 1∶10.</p>b<p>highly overestimated DNA ...
<p>A total of 100 ng of DNA based on NanoDrop (N, black bars) or Qubit (Q, grey bars) measurements w...
<p>Clear bars used DNeasy extraction kit while shaded grey bars used the PowerWater kit. CN = Cellul...
Samples are separated by DNA source (saliva vs. tail-hair). The amount of DNA is that obtained from ...
a<p>DNA concentrations are means calculated using data from eight replicates.</p>b<p>Means with the ...
(A) Showing measured absolute values for DNA concentrations ranging from 0.15 to 400 copies/μL (n = ...
<p>(A) Sensitivity assessment of LAMP when performing the DNA extraction with the i-genomic Urine DN...
<p>Illustration of relative DNA concentrations of samples 1–10 measured by the NanoDrop 2000c spectr...
<p>There is no significant difference in DNA recovery using the lyophilized urine collection pipette...
<p>Means and 95% CI are shown for every combination of substrate and bait, once records >60 ng μl<su...
<p>The percentage of DNA recovered from 1 mL urine samples increases as the concentration of magneti...
<p>Though both are significantly higher than the unextracted sample, which is undetectable by PCR, t...
<p>The concentration of Pt-DACH was 60 µM. Each data point was the mean of four independent measurem...
Due to the presence of PCR inhibitors, PCR cannot be used directly on most clinical samples, includi...
<p>Error bars are standard deviation. LOQ are limit of quantification of the spectrophotometer.</p
*<p>OD<sub>260 nm</sub> of 1 equals 50 ng/µl.</p>a<p>dilution 1∶10.</p>b<p>highly overestimated DNA ...
<p>A total of 100 ng of DNA based on NanoDrop (N, black bars) or Qubit (Q, grey bars) measurements w...
<p>Clear bars used DNeasy extraction kit while shaded grey bars used the PowerWater kit. CN = Cellul...
Samples are separated by DNA source (saliva vs. tail-hair). The amount of DNA is that obtained from ...
a<p>DNA concentrations are means calculated using data from eight replicates.</p>b<p>Means with the ...
(A) Showing measured absolute values for DNA concentrations ranging from 0.15 to 400 copies/μL (n = ...
<p>(A) Sensitivity assessment of LAMP when performing the DNA extraction with the i-genomic Urine DN...
<p>Illustration of relative DNA concentrations of samples 1–10 measured by the NanoDrop 2000c spectr...
<p>There is no significant difference in DNA recovery using the lyophilized urine collection pipette...
<p>Means and 95% CI are shown for every combination of substrate and bait, once records >60 ng μl<su...