a<p>DNA concentrations are means calculated using data from eight replicates.</p>b<p>Means with the same letter are not significantly different.</p
150, 150°C hot-air drying; 80, 80°C hot-air drying; 40, 40°C hot-air drying; N, natural drying; S, s...
Samples are separated by DNA source (saliva vs. tail-hair). The amount of DNA is that obtained from ...
<p>Species identification success across different classes of DNA concentration in saliva extracts.<...
<p>Comparative DNA concentrations and PCR success rates of different grades of samples.</p
<p>DNA concentration is shown for each paired sample of DNA extractions with and without enzymatic d...
<p>n = sample size. Each extraction method was tested six times on each material. PCR and qPCR were ...
<p>Quantification of (A) crude extracted DNA, (B) 16S rRNA genes, (C) 18S rRNA genes, (D) archaeal 1...
<p>Illustration of relative DNA concentrations of samples 1–10 measured by the NanoDrop 2000c spectr...
<p>DNA yield represents the Average ± SD values of four different soils.</p><p>Nil represents there ...
Each extraction method is designated by a specific colour (see key) which is maintained in Fig 2A an...
<p>DNA concentration (μg/mL) was quantified in a spectrophotometer (A<sub>260</sub> nm).</p><p>Yield...
<p>Comparison of identifications of various agents identified from the blood culture (BC) samples wi...
<p><b>Normalised DNA yield (ng/</b>μ<b>L) from (A) plaque and (B) saliva (mean ± SEM).</b> M: MoBio ...
(a) Comparison of DNA extracting capacities of five current methods. (b) DNA electrophoresis of the ...
<p>Distribution of DNA concentrations of samples 1–16 measured by each of the five quantification me...
150, 150°C hot-air drying; 80, 80°C hot-air drying; 40, 40°C hot-air drying; N, natural drying; S, s...
Samples are separated by DNA source (saliva vs. tail-hair). The amount of DNA is that obtained from ...
<p>Species identification success across different classes of DNA concentration in saliva extracts.<...
<p>Comparative DNA concentrations and PCR success rates of different grades of samples.</p
<p>DNA concentration is shown for each paired sample of DNA extractions with and without enzymatic d...
<p>n = sample size. Each extraction method was tested six times on each material. PCR and qPCR were ...
<p>Quantification of (A) crude extracted DNA, (B) 16S rRNA genes, (C) 18S rRNA genes, (D) archaeal 1...
<p>Illustration of relative DNA concentrations of samples 1–10 measured by the NanoDrop 2000c spectr...
<p>DNA yield represents the Average ± SD values of four different soils.</p><p>Nil represents there ...
Each extraction method is designated by a specific colour (see key) which is maintained in Fig 2A an...
<p>DNA concentration (μg/mL) was quantified in a spectrophotometer (A<sub>260</sub> nm).</p><p>Yield...
<p>Comparison of identifications of various agents identified from the blood culture (BC) samples wi...
<p><b>Normalised DNA yield (ng/</b>μ<b>L) from (A) plaque and (B) saliva (mean ± SEM).</b> M: MoBio ...
(a) Comparison of DNA extracting capacities of five current methods. (b) DNA electrophoresis of the ...
<p>Distribution of DNA concentrations of samples 1–16 measured by each of the five quantification me...
150, 150°C hot-air drying; 80, 80°C hot-air drying; 40, 40°C hot-air drying; N, natural drying; S, s...
Samples are separated by DNA source (saliva vs. tail-hair). The amount of DNA is that obtained from ...
<p>Species identification success across different classes of DNA concentration in saliva extracts.<...
DOI
Add to ORKG