<p>(A) Quantification of biofilm density (relative to biofilm of wild-type strain 100-23C) by confocal microscopy and cell counts in forestomach contents of <i>L. reuteri</i> mutants two days after gavage with a single dose of ∼10<sup>7</sup> cells. ANOVA with Dunnett's multiple comparison test, *, <i>p</i><0.05; **, <i>p</i><0.01; ***, <i>p</i><0.001). Confocal micrographs of forestomach tissue from mice colonized for two days with (B) wild type, (C) <i>secA2</i> mutant, (D) <i>lysM3</i> mutant, and (E) <i>lr70902</i> mutant.</p
<p>Biofilm formation was compared between the wild-type and <i>rgg2</i> mutant strains. The strains ...
<p>(A) Quantification of adherence ability to plastic slides of wild-type (JC1089), <i>cbk1</i>Δ <i>...
<p>Metabolic activity of the cells was measured by XTT assay on polysterene plates (A), and plates c...
<p>(A) Quantification of biofilm density (relative to biofilm of strain 100-23) by confocal microsco...
<p>(A) Scanning electron microscopy micrograph of forestomach epithelium of ex germ-free mice two da...
<p>(A) Percentage of biofilm accumulation on inert polystyrene surfaces by HC474 (WT), M1HC474 (<i>l...
<p>Biofilms developed were quantified (A) by crystal violet staining on microtiter plates after 4 ho...
A. Biofilm formation. Wildtype, ΔmutS, and ΔmutS* smooth and rugose variants were cultured in LB wit...
<p>(A) Microtiter plate assay: Biofilm was measured each day for cells inoculated in TSB broth with ...
<p>A, biofilm structural comparison of the <i>ldh</i> mutant (left) and SK36 by confocal laser scann...
<p>Biofilms were grown 24 h and stained with the LIVE/DEAD Biofilm Viability kit (Life Technologies,...
<p>Wild type and mutant strains were induced to form biofilms in 96-well polystyrene plates in minim...
<p>Biofilm formation by wild type and <i>clp</i> mutants in LB medium (A) and on MSgg medium plates ...
<p>Biofilm formation was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively for opaque, rugose, and transluce...
<p>(A) The density of the biofilms formed by the indicated wild type (SN250), heterozygous and homoz...
<p>Biofilm formation was compared between the wild-type and <i>rgg2</i> mutant strains. The strains ...
<p>(A) Quantification of adherence ability to plastic slides of wild-type (JC1089), <i>cbk1</i>Δ <i>...
<p>Metabolic activity of the cells was measured by XTT assay on polysterene plates (A), and plates c...
<p>(A) Quantification of biofilm density (relative to biofilm of strain 100-23) by confocal microsco...
<p>(A) Scanning electron microscopy micrograph of forestomach epithelium of ex germ-free mice two da...
<p>(A) Percentage of biofilm accumulation on inert polystyrene surfaces by HC474 (WT), M1HC474 (<i>l...
<p>Biofilms developed were quantified (A) by crystal violet staining on microtiter plates after 4 ho...
A. Biofilm formation. Wildtype, ΔmutS, and ΔmutS* smooth and rugose variants were cultured in LB wit...
<p>(A) Microtiter plate assay: Biofilm was measured each day for cells inoculated in TSB broth with ...
<p>A, biofilm structural comparison of the <i>ldh</i> mutant (left) and SK36 by confocal laser scann...
<p>Biofilms were grown 24 h and stained with the LIVE/DEAD Biofilm Viability kit (Life Technologies,...
<p>Wild type and mutant strains were induced to form biofilms in 96-well polystyrene plates in minim...
<p>Biofilm formation by wild type and <i>clp</i> mutants in LB medium (A) and on MSgg medium plates ...
<p>Biofilm formation was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively for opaque, rugose, and transluce...
<p>(A) The density of the biofilms formed by the indicated wild type (SN250), heterozygous and homoz...
<p>Biofilm formation was compared between the wild-type and <i>rgg2</i> mutant strains. The strains ...
<p>(A) Quantification of adherence ability to plastic slides of wild-type (JC1089), <i>cbk1</i>Δ <i>...
<p>Metabolic activity of the cells was measured by XTT assay on polysterene plates (A), and plates c...