<p>(a) T1 display: T1 and three distracters were presented at random locations on a 3×3 virtual matrix. Two visual stimuli were displayed on each side (left or right) of the fixation. (b) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and Lag conditions. (c) T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone and T2 visual field conditions. The vertical axes indicate the T2 accuracy (percent correct). Error bars represent standard errors of the mean (<i>n</i> = 9).</p
<p>Percentages of correctly identified T1 (relative to all trials) are depicted in the upper panel, ...
<p>Gray bar: results from Experiment 1 where there was no central fixation task. Recognition accurac...
<p>The left panel plots T2 accuracy given that T1 was identified. Consistent with our prior findings...
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
<p>The left panel shows T1 performance, and the right panel shows T2 performance, given that T1 was ...
<p>The left panel shows T1 performance, and the right panel shows T2 performance, given that T1 was ...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 (black symbols) and T2 given correct report of T1 (white sym...
<p>(A) T1 performance; (B) T2 performance. The results are shown separately for the neutral and fear...
<p>Predicted probability of correct T1 identification as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SO...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>(A) T1 performance; (B) T2 performance. The results are shown separately for the neutral and fear...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Percentages of correctly identified T1 (relative to all trials) are depicted in the upper panel, ...
<p>Gray bar: results from Experiment 1 where there was no central fixation task. Recognition accurac...
<p>The left panel plots T2 accuracy given that T1 was identified. Consistent with our prior findings...
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
<p>(a) T1 accuracy and T2 accuracy (given that T1 is correct) in each of the Tone, Visual field, and...
<p>The left panel shows T1 performance, and the right panel shows T2 performance, given that T1 was ...
<p>The left panel shows T1 performance, and the right panel shows T2 performance, given that T1 was ...
<p>Mean percentage correct report of T1 (black symbols) and T2 given correct report of T1 (white sym...
<p>(A) T1 performance; (B) T2 performance. The results are shown separately for the neutral and fear...
<p>Predicted probability of correct T1 identification as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SO...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>(A) T1 performance; (B) T2 performance. The results are shown separately for the neutral and fear...
<p>Target stimuli were identical to Experiment 1. Distractors were either (A) mosaic-scrambled faces...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Performance is depicted separately for the different facial expressions of T2. T2 detection is co...
<p>Percentages of correctly identified T1 (relative to all trials) are depicted in the upper panel, ...
<p>Gray bar: results from Experiment 1 where there was no central fixation task. Recognition accurac...
<p>The left panel plots T2 accuracy given that T1 was identified. Consistent with our prior findings...