<p>Chance level is 0.2. G-SVC and G-SVC<sup>g</sup> clearly outperform the other methods, and display good robustness to the choice of the number of graph nodes.</p
<p>The plot shows true positive rates (TPR; fraction of true gBGC bases correctly predicted) and pos...
<p>Classification accuracy was consistently better for patterns of activity over an increasing numbe...
<p>(a) Results obtained with GES data generation. (b) Results obtained with SLC data generation.</p
<p>Mean accuracy (± standard error) of G-SVC as a function of the number of nodes <i>q</i>. Chance l...
<p>Each data point in the figure is an average over 50 network instances. (<b>a</b>) FVCC accuracy a...
We started with n = 4 as the smallest network that can contain two ‘groups’ (n > 1); this is followe...
(A-D) The Pearson correlation between the estimated number of clusters and the ground-truth (Referen...
<p>(a) Taking the data for each propagation distance separately, (b) taking the 2 m data as a refere...
<p>Results show the mean accuracy (upper plot) and proportion of significant results (bottom plot) o...
(a) Clusters generated with a cv-score of 0.97. (b) Graph illustrating out-of-sample error for each ...
<p>We compare <i>pathfinder</i> to basic eQTL mapping, with respect to the size of their credible se...
<p>Numbers indicated are %-accuracy calculated excluding unknown cells. Numbers in parentheses indic...
<p><b>A</b>) We represent accuracy as the frequency with which the correct simulated transmission ev...
The SVM accuracy on the SNN output exceeded the accuracy on the MFSC features after 900 samples. The...
Bar plot showing the mean count of false positives (red), false negatives (orange), and true detecte...
<p>The plot shows true positive rates (TPR; fraction of true gBGC bases correctly predicted) and pos...
<p>Classification accuracy was consistently better for patterns of activity over an increasing numbe...
<p>(a) Results obtained with GES data generation. (b) Results obtained with SLC data generation.</p
<p>Mean accuracy (± standard error) of G-SVC as a function of the number of nodes <i>q</i>. Chance l...
<p>Each data point in the figure is an average over 50 network instances. (<b>a</b>) FVCC accuracy a...
We started with n = 4 as the smallest network that can contain two ‘groups’ (n > 1); this is followe...
(A-D) The Pearson correlation between the estimated number of clusters and the ground-truth (Referen...
<p>(a) Taking the data for each propagation distance separately, (b) taking the 2 m data as a refere...
<p>Results show the mean accuracy (upper plot) and proportion of significant results (bottom plot) o...
(a) Clusters generated with a cv-score of 0.97. (b) Graph illustrating out-of-sample error for each ...
<p>We compare <i>pathfinder</i> to basic eQTL mapping, with respect to the size of their credible se...
<p>Numbers indicated are %-accuracy calculated excluding unknown cells. Numbers in parentheses indic...
<p><b>A</b>) We represent accuracy as the frequency with which the correct simulated transmission ev...
The SVM accuracy on the SNN output exceeded the accuracy on the MFSC features after 900 samples. The...
Bar plot showing the mean count of false positives (red), false negatives (orange), and true detecte...
<p>The plot shows true positive rates (TPR; fraction of true gBGC bases correctly predicted) and pos...
<p>Classification accuracy was consistently better for patterns of activity over an increasing numbe...
<p>(a) Results obtained with GES data generation. (b) Results obtained with SLC data generation.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG