<p>Comparison of assembly accuracy between PMAG and SCJ under different expected numbers of evolutionary events along a tree branch. ( equals to the number of genes).</p
<p>Time consumptions of four methods (including the previous greedy version of PMAG in analyzing lar...
<p>Results from 44 genome assemblies produced by 7 different assemblers measured by 2 metrics:</p> <...
<p>Standard deviations are given at the top of bars. X-axis represents the tree diameters from 1 to ...
<p>Comparison of the assembly accuracy between PMAG and its greedy version. The number of genomes is...
<p>Comparison of the adjacency accuracy between PMAG and its greedy version. The number of genomes i...
<p>Comparison of genome assembly results derived from different sequencing technologies and assembly...
<p>Datasets were simulated to have 10 genomes and 500 genes. X-axis represents the tree diameters fr...
<p>Chimera rate versus gene coverage when <i>k-mer</i> size or overlap threshold changes for differe...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four binary classification datasets by varying the number of...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four multiclass classification datasets by varying the numbe...
<p>Comparison of different short read assemblers and strategies employed on the basis of various ass...
Relationship between speed-up and assembly variables analyzed by YORO and BLAST: (A) speed-up vs gen...
<p>(a) The assembly efficiency and fragment count to assemble a 2000 bp gene using different fragmen...
<p>Performance comparison of different assembly tools on recovering complete gene isoforms of <i>Ara...
<p>Comparison of cloning efficiencies of three methods producing different single-stranded overlaps....
<p>Time consumptions of four methods (including the previous greedy version of PMAG in analyzing lar...
<p>Results from 44 genome assemblies produced by 7 different assemblers measured by 2 metrics:</p> <...
<p>Standard deviations are given at the top of bars. X-axis represents the tree diameters from 1 to ...
<p>Comparison of the assembly accuracy between PMAG and its greedy version. The number of genomes is...
<p>Comparison of the adjacency accuracy between PMAG and its greedy version. The number of genomes i...
<p>Comparison of genome assembly results derived from different sequencing technologies and assembly...
<p>Datasets were simulated to have 10 genomes and 500 genes. X-axis represents the tree diameters fr...
<p>Chimera rate versus gene coverage when <i>k-mer</i> size or overlap threshold changes for differe...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four binary classification datasets by varying the number of...
<p>Comparison of prediction accuracy on four multiclass classification datasets by varying the numbe...
<p>Comparison of different short read assemblers and strategies employed on the basis of various ass...
Relationship between speed-up and assembly variables analyzed by YORO and BLAST: (A) speed-up vs gen...
<p>(a) The assembly efficiency and fragment count to assemble a 2000 bp gene using different fragmen...
<p>Performance comparison of different assembly tools on recovering complete gene isoforms of <i>Ara...
<p>Comparison of cloning efficiencies of three methods producing different single-stranded overlaps....
<p>Time consumptions of four methods (including the previous greedy version of PMAG in analyzing lar...
<p>Results from 44 genome assemblies produced by 7 different assemblers measured by 2 metrics:</p> <...
<p>Standard deviations are given at the top of bars. X-axis represents the tree diameters from 1 to ...
DOI
Add to ORKG