<p>Comparison of cloning efficiencies of three methods producing different single-stranded overlaps.</p
<p>The overlap between 41 genes identified from three different methods and 742 cancer genes.</p
Comparison of shared genes identified by selected methods on two independent PAAD datasets.</p
Comparison of different library preparation methods regarding the number of reads mapped to the resp...
<p><b>Comparison across the three algorithms in terms of overlapping regions, total copy numbers and...
<p>Comparison of clone detection accuracy between DeClone and BASE in varying number of clone IDs.</...
Comparison of the cloning efficiency of RQ-SLIC compared to three established methods based on wild-...
<p>Comparison of the classical and the ligation-independent expression cloning workflows.</p
<p>Comparison of clone detection accuracy between MCH, DeClone and BASE in varying number of clone I...
<p>Comparison of genome assembly results derived from different sequencing technologies and assembly...
<p>PCR and VDJSeq-Solver main clone sequences comparisons. Gene assignments for the PCR and the VDJS...
<p>Cloning efficiency of EMP and RF cloning are compared. (A) Agarose gel band intensities of 2<sup>...
<p>Comparison of concepts between Southern blot analysis, Target capture sequencing and Whole Genome...
<p>Single antibody clones selected by three different panning methods for further biochemical charac...
<p>Note: 30 cycles of PCR with 1000 copies of each template.</p><p>Comparison of recombination frequ...
Comparison of mutations between Sanger Sequencing and Next-Generation Sequencing.</p
<p>The overlap between 41 genes identified from three different methods and 742 cancer genes.</p
Comparison of shared genes identified by selected methods on two independent PAAD datasets.</p
Comparison of different library preparation methods regarding the number of reads mapped to the resp...
<p><b>Comparison across the three algorithms in terms of overlapping regions, total copy numbers and...
<p>Comparison of clone detection accuracy between DeClone and BASE in varying number of clone IDs.</...
Comparison of the cloning efficiency of RQ-SLIC compared to three established methods based on wild-...
<p>Comparison of the classical and the ligation-independent expression cloning workflows.</p
<p>Comparison of clone detection accuracy between MCH, DeClone and BASE in varying number of clone I...
<p>Comparison of genome assembly results derived from different sequencing technologies and assembly...
<p>PCR and VDJSeq-Solver main clone sequences comparisons. Gene assignments for the PCR and the VDJS...
<p>Cloning efficiency of EMP and RF cloning are compared. (A) Agarose gel band intensities of 2<sup>...
<p>Comparison of concepts between Southern blot analysis, Target capture sequencing and Whole Genome...
<p>Single antibody clones selected by three different panning methods for further biochemical charac...
<p>Note: 30 cycles of PCR with 1000 copies of each template.</p><p>Comparison of recombination frequ...
Comparison of mutations between Sanger Sequencing and Next-Generation Sequencing.</p
<p>The overlap between 41 genes identified from three different methods and 742 cancer genes.</p
Comparison of shared genes identified by selected methods on two independent PAAD datasets.</p
Comparison of different library preparation methods regarding the number of reads mapped to the resp...
DOI
Add to ORKG